Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Instrument Calibration

Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...

Distance Corrections

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the other increases, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Does applying CPAK classification boundaries using measurements from a surgical navigation system result in different class distributions? A retrospective assessment.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2026

Same author

MR imaging methods to study meniscal position and mechanics.

Osteoarthritis imaging·2026

Same author

Improving peptide vaccine manufacturability without sacrificing immunogenicity: substitution of methionine and cysteine with oxidation-resistant isosteres.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Assessing the potential fire tolerance of conifer saplings in cold and wet environments using a pyro-ecophysiology approach.

Fire ecology·2026

Same author

Bony Union in Maxilla and Mandible Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Head & neck·2026

Same author

Perinatal hyperandrogenization and immune activation in rodents model subtypes of autism.

Translational psychiatry·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Use of Atomic Force Microscopy to Measure Mechanical Properties and Turgor Pressure of Plant Cells and Plant Tissues

Use of Atomic Force Microscopy to Measure Mechanical Properties and Turgor Pressure of Plant Cells and Plant Tissues

Published on: July 15, 2019

Effect of calibration method on Tekscan sensor accuracy.

Jill M Brimacombe¹, David R Wilson, Antony J Hodgson

¹Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, V6R 2L7, Canada.

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

|January 22, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Custom calibration protocols significantly improve Tekscan pressure sensor accuracy in biomechanics research. User-defined curves, especially a ten-point cubic fit, offer superior precision over default software methods for measuring joint contact loads.

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Use of Atomic Force Microscopy to Measure Mechanical Properties and Turgor Pressure of Plant Cells and Plant Tissues

Use of Atomic Force Microscopy to Measure Mechanical Properties and Turgor Pressure of Plant Cells and Plant Tissues

Published on: July 15, 2019

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Area of Science:

Biomechanics
Biomedical Engineering
Sensor Technology

Background:

Tekscan pressure sensors are vital for measuring joint contact loads in biomechanics.
Previous studies reported sensor accuracy, but calibration algorithm effects remained uncompared.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify the optimal Tekscan software calibration method.
To compare software calibration accuracy against two user-defined protocols.
To evaluate calibration accuracy across low, high, and full sensor ranges.

Main Methods:

Experimental setup mimicked prosthetic joint materials (metal-on-plastic).
Evaluated Tekscan power calibration, linear calibrations, a ten-point cubic calibration, and a three-point quadratic calibration.
Assessed root-mean-square (rms) error relative to the sensor's tested range.

Main Results:

Tekscan power calibration yielded 2.7% rms error; linear calibrations up to 24%.
User-defined ten-point cubic calibration achieved 0.6% rms error (five times more accurate than power calibration).
User-defined three-point quadratic calibration was twice as accurate as power calibration but sensitive to load points.

Conclusions:

User-defined calibration curves enhance accuracy and identify error ranges for optimal point selection.
Investigate sensor behavior for each application due to protocol-dependent nonlinearity.
Custom calibration is recommended for precise joint contact load measurements.