Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement
1Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
|January 22, 2009
Summary
Orthodontic mini-implants are effective in most areas with bone density over 850 Hounsfield units (HU) up to 6 mm apical to the alveolar crest. Site selection for mini-implants should consider bone density variations.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental Implantology
- Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
Background:
- Implant stability is crucial for orthodontic anchorage and is linked to local bone density.
- Limited research exists on interradicular bone density concerning orthodontic mini-implant placement.
- This study addresses the need to evaluate bone density variations in interradicular sites.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and compare bone density differences across various interradicular sites.
- To inform optimal placement strategies for orthodontic mini-implants based on bone density.
- To investigate the relationship between bone density and anatomical location for mini-implant anchorage.
Main Methods:
- Computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired from 28 participants (14 male, 14 female; mean age 27 years).
- Bone density was quantified in Hounsfield units (HU) at 13 interradicular locations and four distinct bone levels.
- Analysis focused on variations in bone density within the maxilla and mandible.
Main Results:
- Most evaluated sites exhibited bone densities exceeding 850 HU.
- Significant differences in bone density were observed across different levels and interradicular sites.
- Bone density increased from the alveolar crest towards basal bone in posterior regions, with an inverse trend in anterior regions.
- Mandibular bone density increased progressively from anterior to posterior areas.
- Significant bone density disparities were noted between maxillary and mandibular posterior regions.
Conclusions:
- Orthodontic mini-implants demonstrate potential efficacy in most areas with bone density up to 850 HU, extending 6 mm apical to the alveolar crest.
- Placement site selection for orthodontic mini-implants should be guided by thorough bone density assessment.
- Understanding interradicular bone density variations is essential for successful orthodontic anchorage using mini-implants.
