Related Experiment Videos
Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in clinical infections: differences observed by electron microscopy
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
|March 1, 1977
Summary
Electron microscopy can differentiate herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) from herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). HSV-2 infected cells exhibit unique microtubule-like structures, aiding in clinical isolate identification.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Cell Biology
- Microscopy
Background:
- Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are common, with HSV-1 and HSV-2 causing distinct clinical manifestations.
- Accurate differentiation between HSV-1 and HSV-2 is crucial for appropriate patient management and epidemiological studies.
- Previous research noted unique ultrastructural features in cells infected with HSV-2.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of electron microscopy (EM) in differentiating clinical isolates of HSV-1 and HSV-2.
- To determine if the presence of microtubule-like structures in infected cells can serve as a reliable marker for HSV-2 identification.
Main Methods:
- BHK-21/4 cells were infected with known strains of HSV-1 and HSV-2.
- Vesicular fluid from 50 clinical isolates (perioral, penile, leg) was used to inoculate BHK-21/4 cells.
- Infected cells were examined using electron microscopy to detect ultrastructural changes, specifically microtubule-like structures.
- Clinical isolates were also typed using indirect hemagglutination for comparison.
Main Results:
- Microtubule-like structures were consistently observed in BHK-21/4 cells infected with HSV-2 strains and clinical isolates from genital or leg lesions.
- Cells infected with HSV-1 strains or clinical isolates from perioral lesions did not show these microtubule-like structures.
- Electron microscopy typing results for clinical isolates perfectly matched those obtained by indirect hemagglutination.
Conclusions:
- Electron microscopy, by identifying microtubule-like structures, provides an accurate method for differentiating HSV-2 from HSV-1 in clinical samples.
- This ultrastructural marker offers a valuable diagnostic tool for distinguishing between HSV types, particularly for genital and leg lesion isolates.
- The findings support EM as a reliable alternative or complementary method to serological typing for HSV identification.