Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

The nursing process provides a clinical decision-making framework for patients and families to establish and implement a personalized care plan. Since part of the nurse's duties is to teach patients, the steps of the nursing process are the most effective way to approach instruction. The nursing process and the teaching-learning process are inextricably linked.
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bridging the Gap: Recommendations for Sustainable Research Partnerships Between Community Health and Academic Health Centers.

Journal of health care for the poor and underserved·2026
Same author

Improving Hospital-to-Skilled Nursing Facility Transitions: Resident-Led Implementation and Evaluation of an EHR-Embedded Discharge Checklist.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same author

Preoperative Risk Evaluation for Cancer Treatment (PREdiCT): protocol for an international cohort study evaluating a trimodal screening tool to predict outcomes following gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Oral oxycodone versus sublingual buprenorphine for postoperative pain control after pelvic exenteration (PROSPER): a pilot, registry-embedded, multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

From research to impact: two decades of advancing age-friendly policies worldwide.

The Public policy and aging report·2026
Same author

Economic impact of preoperative frailty in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery.

Journal of geriatric oncology·2026
Same journal

Psychologists' and patients' views on empathy in teletherapy: A mixed-methods study.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Barriers to the assessment of patients' sexuality and sexual health among psychotherapists: A mixed-methods study.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Exploring surgical patients' health literacy following the use of a patient safety checklist - A qualitative study.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Virga and the future of motivational interviewing: Issues in training counseling skills.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Informed choices: Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on high-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing patients switching back to physical channels for health consultations.

Patient education and counseling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
06:40

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management

Published on: June 29, 2019

Implementing patient decision support tools: moving beyond academia?

James D Harrison1, Lindy Masya, Phyllis Butow

  • 1Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Sydney South West Area Health Service & School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. james.harrison@email.cs.nsw.gov.au

Patient Education and Counseling
|January 23, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Surgeons find decision support tools (DSTs) for rectal cancer useful but not feasible for current surgical consultations due to implementation barriers. Further studies are needed to guide DST development and integration.

More Related Videos

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
06:40

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management

Published on: June 29, 2019

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Decision support tools (DSTs) aim to aid patient and clinician decision-making in healthcare.
  • Rectal cancer treatment involves complex decisions requiring effective communication and information sharing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of integrating three DSTs for rectal cancer patients into surgical consultations.
  • To identify surgeon perspectives on the utility and barriers to DST implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study involving focus groups and individual interviews with 20 colorectal surgeons.
  • Quantitative data collected via self-administered questionnaires.
  • Exploration of surgeon feedback on DST concept, usefulness, and implementation challenges.

Main Results:

  • Surgeons viewed DSTs positively but noted significant implementation barriers.
  • While 70-75% found DSTs useful, most felt they were not feasible in their current form for surgical consultations.
  • Key barriers included time constraints, patient factors, tool content, and potential impact on the doctor-patient relationship.

Conclusions:

  • Surgeons have identified substantial barriers to the routine clinical implementation of DSTs for rectal cancer.
  • Feasibility and implementation studies are crucial for guiding the development and effective integration of DSTs into practice.