Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Methods of Medium Optimization

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...

Hazard Ratio

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Association of Baclofen With Encephalopathy in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

JAMA·2019

Same author

Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening by Physicians Is Associated With Greater Uptake by Their Patients.

Gastroenterology·2019

Same author

Preoperative Vitamin D Concentration and Cardiac, Renal, and Infectious Morbidity after Noncardiac Surgery.

Anesthesiology·2019

Same author

Identifying Ontario geographic regions to assess adults who present to hospital with laboratory-defined conditions: a descriptive study.

CMAJ open·2019

Same author

Home Dialysis Is Associated with Lower Costs and Better Survival than Other Modalities: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada.

Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis·2019

Same author

Postdonation eGFR and New-Onset Antihypertensive Medication Use After Living Kidney Donation.

Transplantation direct·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Primer on systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marcello Tonelli¹, Dan Hackam, Amit X Garg

¹Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)

|January 24, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize research findings. While meta-analyses offer precise effect estimates, their conclusions can be limited by study quality and bias.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Research Methodology
Evidence Synthesis

Background:

Systematic reviews provide a rigorous approach to summarizing existing research.
Meta-analyses statistically combine data from multiple studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To define the process and limitations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
To highlight the strengths and weaknesses of evidence synthesis methods.

Main Methods:

Systematic reviews involve comprehensive literature searches and critical appraisal.
Meta-analyses pool aggregate data from identified primary studies.

Main Results:

Systematic reviews identify, appraise, and summarize studies on a focused question.
Meta-analyses can yield more precise effect estimates than individual studies.

Conclusions:

Meta-analysis conclusions are influenced by study heterogeneity and potential biases.
The quality of primary studies impacts the reliability of meta-analysis findings.