Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Humanistic Psychology01:24

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the human psyche...
Humanistic Therapy01:24

Humanistic Therapy

Humanistic therapies emphasize personal growth, self-understanding, and the fulfillment of human potential. Rooted in the belief that individuals inherently strive toward self-actualization, these approaches encourage clients to explore their feelings and experiences in a supportive, nonjudgmental environment. Humanistic therapies differ from psychodynamic approaches by focusing on conscious experiences, present circumstances, and the potential for self-improvement rather than past conflicts...
Carl Rogers' Humanistic Perspective on Personality01:23

Carl Rogers' Humanistic Perspective on Personality

Carl Rogers, a key figure in humanistic psychology, believed that individuals possess an innate potential for growth and fulfillment. According to his model of personality, three significant components define an individual: the organism, the self, and conditions of worth.
The organism refers to an individual's inherent blueprint, which Rogers saw as innately positive and directed toward helping others, unlike Freud's view of the id as driven by base impulses. The self is a person's...
Biodiversity and Human Values01:24

Biodiversity and Human Values

Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.
Natural Selection and Adaptation01:15

Natural Selection and Adaptation

Natural selection, a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology, is the mechanism by which evolution is driven, favoring organisms that are best adapted to their environments. This process enhances their chances of survival and reproduction. Adaptation, a key outcome of this process, involves genetic modifications that optimize an organism's functionality under specific environmental challenges, such as extreme cold or thinner air at high altitudes.
Beyond physical adaptations, psychological...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the Ethics of Vaccine Nationalism: The Case for the Fair Priority for Residents Framework.

Ethics & international affairs·2021
Same author

What are the obligations of pharmaceutical companies in a global health emergency?

Lancet (London, England)·2021
Same author

An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2020
Same author

PRINCIPAL/AGENT THEORY AND DECISIONMAKING IN HEALTH CARE.

Bioethics·2017
Same author

Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem.

Journal of medical ethics·2011
Same author

Still unconvinced, but still tentative: a reply to DeGrazia.

Journal of medical ethics·2011
Same journal

Surrogacy and the Moral Significance of Gestation: Reassessing Procreative Responsibilities.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Human nature and enhancement.

Allen Buchanan1

  • 1Philosophy and Investigator, Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University. allenb@duke.edu

Bioethics
|January 24, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Biotechnology enhancements may alter human nature, but this is not inherently bad. Our ability to define

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Human Enhancement
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Ethical debates on human enhancement frequently invoke the concept of human nature.
  • Concerns exist that biotechnology may alter or destroy human nature.
  • This alteration is feared to undermine our capacity to determine what is good.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the ethical implications of altering human nature through biotechnology.
  • To challenge the assumption that human nature is inherently good and should be preserved.
  • To argue that appeals to human nature obscure, rather than clarify, enhancement ethics.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of ethical arguments concerning human nature and enhancement.
  • Deconstruction of the presumed link between human nature and the definition of 'the good'.
  • Conceptual evaluation of the role of human nature in ethical decision-making.

Main Results:

  • Altering human nature is not intrinsically wrong, as human nature contains both positive and negative traits.
  • Eliminating negative aspects of human nature is permissible and does not necessarily jeopardize the good.
  • Human nature does not serve as the sole determinant for defining 'the good'.

Conclusions:

  • Appeals to human nature in enhancement ethics are often misleading.
  • Ethical considerations of human enhancement can be more effectively addressed by focusing on specific consequences rather than abstract notions of nature.
  • A robust conception of the good exists independently of a fixed human nature, allowing for ethical judgment post-enhancement.