Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Standardized Measurement of Nasal Membrane Transepithelial Potential Difference (NPD)
09:47

Standardized Measurement of Nasal Membrane Transepithelial Potential Difference (NPD)

Published on: September 13, 2018

Medical instrument data exchange.

Suman Gumudavelli1, Paul K McKneely, Pongnarin Thongpithoonrat

  • 1Engineering Technology Dept., University of Houston, TX 77204-4020, USA.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
|January 24, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Automated Microbial Diagnostics01:24

Automated Microbial Diagnostics

Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance analysis of a proposed tightly-coupled medical instrument network based on CAN protocol.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2010
Same author

Networking and plug-and-play of bedside medical instruments.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2009
Same author

High-diffraction-efficiency pseudorandom encoding.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2000
Same journal

Analysis of End-Tidal CO2 Variability During Plateau Waves Episodes: An Information Theoretic Approach<sup></sup>.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same journal

AI and Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping: A step toward precision medicine<sup></sup>.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same journal

Towards Sustainable Protein Recovery from Biological Waste: Assessing Polyethersulfone-based Microfiltration.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same journal

Analysis of the cardiovascular response to standardized polymicrobial peritonitis experimental model.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same journal

Automated Wrist Ultrasound Image Bone Enhancement and Segmentation Using Deep Learning.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same journal

A Deep Learning approach for Depressive Symptoms assessment in Parkinson's disease patients using facial videos.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
See all related articles

This study compares ISO/IEEE 11073 (X73) and MediCAN data models for medical device interoperability. It highlights the need for a common standard to overcome proprietary technologies in healthcare networking.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Medical device networking relies on proprietary technologies, hindering interoperability.
  • A uniform data model is needed for seamless data access across diverse bedside instruments.
  • Existing standards like ISO/IEEE 11073 (X73) and MediCAN aim to address this challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the data models of ISO/IEEE 11073 (X73) and MediCAN.
  • To promote interoperability demonstrations between medical instruments using these standards.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of X73 and MediCAN in unifying medical device interfaces.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of the ISO/IEEE 11073 (X73) data model.
  • Comparative analysis of the MediCAN technology suite's data model.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Standardized Measurement of Nasal Membrane Transepithelial Potential Difference (NPD)
09:47

Standardized Measurement of Nasal Membrane Transepithelial Potential Difference (NPD)

Published on: September 13, 2018

  • Review of existing literature on medical device communication standards.
  • Main Results:

    • ISO/IEEE 11073 (X73) defines specific client access mechanisms for medical devices.
    • MediCAN offers a more generic data definition for flexible networking and client access.
    • Both standards aim to achieve interfacing and networking of medical instruments.

    Conclusions:

    • A common standard is crucial for internetworking diverse medical devices.
    • Comparing X73 and MediCAN data models can encourage broader adoption and interoperability.
    • Further demonstrations are needed to validate the practical application of these standards.