Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models
04:13

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models

Published on: September 27, 2024

Vulnerable structures during intraoral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Kun Hwang1, Yong Seok Nam, Seung Ho Han

  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery and Center for Advanced Medical Education by BK21 Project, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|January 24, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study mapped vulnerable anatomical structures during sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Minimizing ramus setback can help avoid facial nerve injury, while the retromandibular vein is a likely source of bleeding.

Related Concept Videos

Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Writing papers: literary and scientific.

Journal of trauma and injury·2024
Same author

Near-death experiences in 19th century Korean tales.

Journal of trauma and injury·2024
Same author

Challenging Dogmas in Plastic Surgery.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2024
Same author

Concept of Rejuvenation in Greek Mythology and Modern Plastic Surgery.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2024
Same author

Possible Bioterrorism by North Korea and South Korea's Preparedness.

Infection & chemotherapy·2024
Same author

It's Time to Say Goodbye to the "Hypocritical Oath".

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2024

Area of Science:

  • Anatomy
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Surgical Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is a common surgical procedure.
  • Understanding the anatomical risks associated with SSRO is crucial for patient safety.
  • Previous studies have not precisely delineated the proximity of key neurovascular structures to the osteotomy site.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and map anatomical structures at risk of injury during SSRO.
  • To precisely measure the location of the facial nerve, retromandibular vein (RMV), and external carotid artery (ECA) relative to the mandible.
  • To provide anatomical data to guide surgical technique and minimize complications.

Main Methods:

  • Dissection of 29 Korean adult cadaver hemifaces.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models
04:13

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models

Published on: September 27, 2024

  • Measurement of facial nerve, RMV, and ECA positions relative to the mandibular posterior border and occlusal plane.
  • Simulation of SSRO at 10 mm intervals to assess facial nerve proximity.
  • Main Results:

    • The facial nerve trunk (FNT) was located within 9 mm of a specific point relative to the mandibular notch.
    • The FNT was 11-14 mm medial to the posterior border of the mandible (PBM).
    • The retromandibular vein (RMV) is closer to the PBM (4-9 mm) than the external carotid artery (ECA) (12-13 mm), suggesting it is a more common source of bleeding.

    Conclusions:

    • Reducing the degree of ramus setback during SSRO can help prevent facial nerve injury.
    • The RMV is more vulnerable to injury than the ECA during SSRO due to its closer proximity to the PBM.
    • Precise anatomical knowledge aids in surgical planning and risk mitigation for SSRO procedures.