Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

PROs' new quality improvement focus: will it work in practice?

T Hudson

    Hospitals
    |November 5, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    New concept: "TARN friendly trauma reporting" (what radiologists say really does matter).

    Clinical radiology·2021
    Same author

    Evaluation of surgical site infection antibiotic prophylaxis among patients receiving antibiotics for active infection.

    The Journal of hospital infection·2019
    Same author

    Ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis in the spinal cord injury population.

    Spinal cord·2012
    Same author

    A targeted association study in systemic lupus erythematosus identifies multiple susceptibility alleles.

    Genes and immunity·2010
    Same author

    COGENT (COlorectal cancer GENeTics): an international consortium to study the role of polymorphic variation on the risk of colorectal cancer.

    British journal of cancer·2009
    Same author

    Holographic recording in specially doped lithium niobate crystals.

    Optics express·2009

    The Health Care Financing Administration

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Administration
    • Quality Improvement
    • Medical Outcomes

    Background:

    • The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) is implementing changes to the PRO program.
    • Provider concerns regarding subjectivity in the review process have been noted.
    • The PRO program is shifting its focus towards measurable outcomes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the implications of the HCFA's PRO program's new emphasis on outcomes.
    • To understand provider perspectives on the shift towards outcomes-based reviews.
    • To assess the potential impact of these changes on healthcare quality and provider relations.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of HCFA policy documents regarding the PRO program.
    • Analysis of provider feedback and concerns.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of the transition from process-based to outcomes-based reviews.

    • Main Results:

    • The PRO program's outcomes focus aims to reduce subjectivity in reviews.
    • Providers express apprehension regarding the practical implementation and fairness of outcomes-based evaluations.
    • There is a noted wariness among providers about how the new system will be applied.

    Conclusions:

    • The shift to an outcomes-based PRO program by HCFA is intended to address provider concerns about review subjectivity.
    • Provider apprehension suggests a need for clear communication and transparent implementation strategies.
    • Further monitoring is required to evaluate the actual impact of the PRO program's outcomes emphasis.