Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Striking global similarities in dog-human interactions.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Vocal emotion perception in hearing loss - feasibility of an online training program to improve emotion perception in older adults.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Neural correlates of temporal interference between faces.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Event-related oscillations in human action observation: the roles of action types and EEG baselines.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Longstanding mental representations of familiar faces.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Shifting focus: Does adaptation to new configural face information alter fixation behavior?

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Gaze perception requires focused attention: evidence from an interference task.

A Mike Burton1, Markus Bindemann, Stephen R H Langton

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. mike@psy.gla.ac.uk

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|January 28, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Gaze direction is hard to process when not the focus of attention. Unlike other facial cues, unattended gaze direction does not influence behavior, suggesting it

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Gaze direction is a salient social cue, typically capturing attention.
  • Understanding the limits of processing socially relevant information is crucial.
  • Previous research suggests gaze direction automatically directs attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether gaze direction is processed when unattended.
  • To determine if unattended gaze direction influences behavioral responses.
  • To compare the processing of unattended gaze with other facial and non-facial cues.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted using directional judgment tasks (face/hand targets).
  • Distractor faces/hands with varying gaze/pointing directions were presented.
  • Congruency effects on target response times measured distractor processing.

Main Results:

  • Distractor hand pointing direction influenced response times (congruency effects).
  • Distractor gaze direction did not influence response times, even with larger distractors.
  • Profile heads and isolated eye regions also failed to produce congruency effects.

Conclusions:

  • Gaze direction is not processed when it is outside the focus of attention.
  • Unlike other facial cues, unattended gaze does not automatically influence behavior.
  • This challenges the notion that gaze direction is an obligatory attentional cue.