Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A carry-over task rule in task switching: an ERP investigation using a Go/Nogo paradigm.

Biological psychology·2012

Same author

[Asymmetric switch cost: an investigation using lateralized readiness potentials].

Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology·2011

Same author

[Hemispheric difference in the time course of semantic activation: evidence from event-related potentials].

Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology·2010

Same author

An ERP investigation of task switching using a flanker paradigm.

Brain research·2010

Same author

[Semantic priming within and between the visual fields: an event-related brain potential study].

Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology·2008

Same author

Recognition memory for unfamiliar faces in Parkinson's disease: behavioral and electrophysiologic measures.

Parkinsonism & related disorders·2006

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

[Stimulus set and response set in task switching: a comparison using ERP].

Kaoru Umebayashi¹, Tsunetaka Okita

¹Graduate School of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Aichi Shukutoku University, Nagakute-cho, Aichi 480-1197, Japan. kaoru-u@abelia.ocn.ne.jp

Shinrigaku Kenkyu : the Japanese Journal of Psychology

|January 29, 2009

Summary

This study investigated cognitive set switching using event-related potentials (ERPs) and reaction times (RTs). Findings reveal that switching tasks prolongs reaction times and impacts motor process initiation, but not motor execution itself.

More Related Videos

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human Factors

Background:

Set switching is a fundamental cognitive process.
Understanding the temporal dynamics of set switching is crucial for cognitive models.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the time course of cognitive processes during set switching.
To differentiate the effects of task set switching on response selection versus motor execution.

Main Methods:

Utilized a cued set-switching paradigm.
Recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) and reaction times (RTs).
Measured stimulus-locked and response-locked lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs).

Main Results:

A significant reaction time (RT) switch cost was observed.
Increased memory comparison demands prolonged RT and P3b latency.
Stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential (LRP) onset latency showed a switch effect.
Response-locked LRP indicated no modification of motor execution by set switching.

Conclusions:

Set switching primarily affects processes preceding motor execution, such as response selection.
The findings support hypotheses of exogenous reconfiguration or carryover in task set updating.
Cognitive control mechanisms for task switching are distinct from motor execution processes.