Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
Published on: June 8, 2020
Which fecal occult blood test is best to screen for colorectal cancer?
Graeme P Young1, Stephen R Cole
1Flinders Centre for Cancer Prevention and Control, Flinders University, Room 3D230, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia. graeme.young@flinders.edu.au
Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin represent a major advance over guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (GFOBTs) for colorectal cancer screening. FITs specifically detect human hemoglobin in stool samples, whereas GFOBTs only detect heme. Studies show that FITs increase the detection rates of cancer and advanced adenoma compared with early-generation GFOBTs, and do so without the unacceptably high number of colonoscopies that high-sensitivity GFOBTs generate. Also, FITs are simpler to use than GFOBTs, they improve rates of patient participation, and their cut-off points for positive versus negative tests can be modified. A large, Dutch, population-based, randomized controlled trial has compared the performance of a GFOBT and a FIT on an intention-to-screen basis. This study found that the FIT detected two-and-a-half times as many cancers and advanced adenomas as did the GFOBT, despite similar colonoscopy rates. The latest generation of FITs should replace traditional GFOBTs in two-step (test then colonoscopy) screening for colorectal cancer.
Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin represent a major advance over guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (GFOBTs) for colorectal cancer screening. FITs specifically detect human hemoglobin in stool samples, whereas GFOBTs only detect heme. Studies show that FITs increase the detection rates of cancer and advanced adenoma compared with early-generation GFOBTs, and do so without the unacceptably high number of colonoscopies that high-sensitivity GFOBTs generate. Also, FITs are simpler to use than GFOBTs, they improve rates of patient participation, and their cut-off points for positive versus negative tests can be modified. A large, Dutch, population-based, randomized controlled trial has compared the performance of a GFOBT and a FIT on an intention-to-screen basis. This study found that the FIT detected two-and-a-half times as many cancers and advanced adenomas as did the GFOBT, despite similar colonoscopy rates. The latest generation of FITs should replace traditional GFOBTs in two-step (test then colonoscopy) screening for colorectal cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

