Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been developed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A server-based solution for misregistration correction in PET/CT using limited-coverage and data-driven gated CT.

Medical physics·2026

Same author

LDM-Morph: Latent diffusion model guided deformable image registration.

Pattern recognition·2026

Same author

Bayesian Learning to Reduce Cardiac Risk of Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Personalized Radiation Therapy Prescription.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2025

Same author

Improving data-driven gated (DDG) PET and CT registration in thoracic lesions: a comparison of AI registration and DDG CT.

EJNMMI physics·2025

Same author

Automatic trending and analysis of SPECT quality assurance with artificial intelligence optical character recognition.

Medical physics·2025

Same author

Robust whole-body PET image denoising using 3D diffusion models: evaluation across various scanners, tracers, and dose levels.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2025

Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Whole-cell Super-Resolution Imaging via DNA-PAINT on a Spinning Disk Confocal with Optical Photon Reassignment

Whole-cell Super-Resolution Imaging via DNA-PAINT on a Spinning Disk Confocal with Optical Photon Reassignment

Published on: January 6, 2026

Optimization of super-resolution processing using incomplete image sets in PET imaging.

Guoping Chang¹, Tinsu Pan, John W Clark

¹Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA.

Medical Physics

|January 30, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Optimized super-resolution (SR) methods (ISR-1 and ISR-2) in PET imaging use fewer low-resolution images, significantly reducing processing time and memory. These methods maintain comparable image quality to standard SR, offering an efficient alternative.

More Related Videos

Super-Resolution Imaging and Shared Management: A Protocol for Confocal Microscopy with Multiplex Detection

Super-Resolution Imaging and Shared Management: A Protocol for Confocal Microscopy with Multiplex Detection

Published on: February 24, 2026

Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform

Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform

Published on: February 12, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Whole-cell Super-Resolution Imaging via DNA-PAINT on a Spinning Disk Confocal with Optical Photon Reassignment

Whole-cell Super-Resolution Imaging via DNA-PAINT on a Spinning Disk Confocal with Optical Photon Reassignment

Published on: January 6, 2026

Super-Resolution Imaging and Shared Management: A Protocol for Confocal Microscopy with Multiplex Detection

Super-Resolution Imaging and Shared Management: A Protocol for Confocal Microscopy with Multiplex Detection

Published on: February 24, 2026

Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform

Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform

Published on: February 12, 2014

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Image Processing
Nuclear Medicine

Background:

Super-resolution (SR) techniques enhance PET image resolution by combining multiple low-resolution images.
The computational cost (processing time and memory) of SR is directly related to the number of low-resolution images used.
Optimizing SR by reducing the number of input images is crucial for practical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and evaluate two optimized SR implementations, ISR-1 and ISR-2, for PET imaging.
To assess if ISR-1 and ISR-2 can achieve performance comparable to conventional SR (CSR) using a reduced subset of low-resolution images.
To quantify the trade-offs in contrast, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and processing efficiency.

Main Methods:

Developed ISR-1 using images from the sides and ISR-2 using images from the diagonal of the low-resolution image matrix.
Conducted simulation, point source, and NEMA/IEC phantom studies using 4 or 16 low-resolution images.
Compared ISR-1, ISR-2, and CSR images against native reconstruction (NR) using visual inspection, line profiles, SNR analysis, and noise spectra.

Main Results:

Simulation studies showed minimal differences (avg. 0.4% for contrast, 0.3% for SNR) between ISR methods and CSR.
Point source studies indicated similar signal amplitudes and full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) across all SR methods.
NEMA/IEC phantom studies revealed an average SNR difference of 2.1% among SR methods, with comparable noise structures.

Conclusions:

ISR-1 and ISR-2 effectively reduce SR processing time and memory requirements.
These optimized methods maintain comparable contrast, resolution, SNR, and noise characteristics to CSR.
ISR-1 and ISR-2 represent viable alternatives to CSR for PET imaging, enhancing computational efficiency without sacrificing image quality.