Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 3. Aerobiology
Published on: October 3, 2016
Rapid response to a case of mumps: implications for preventing transmission at a medical research facility
Gabriela Salmón-Mulanovich1, Gregory Utz, Andrés G Lescano
1Naval Medical Research Center Detachment, Peru.
Objective:
To prevent transmission among the staff and potentially among the non-human primate (NHP) colony at the U.S. Naval Medical Research Center Detachment in Peru, where an active case of mumps was discovered in a senior laboratory technician in Sep 03, 2007.
Material And Methods:
Subjects at the research facility were interviewed and potentially susceptible contacts were tested for mumps IgG.
Results:
In total, 81 out of 106 staff members (76%) had close contact with the case. Only 6/81 (7%) had MMR, 33 (41%) reported having had mumps, and 8 of 45 (18%) of the potentially susceptible individuals did not have immunity (IgG > 20.0). All the susceptible, exposed individuals received MMR vaccine. There were no secondary cases and access to the NHP colony was restricted.
Discussion:
Immediate and thorough investigation and occupational health response were imperative in preventing secondary cases of mumps among humans and NHP.
Insights
Rapid response to a mumps outbreak in Peru prevented secondary cases. Prompt investigation and vaccination of healthcare workers protected both staff and non-human primates from mumps transmission.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
- Veterinary Public Health
Background:
- A mumps outbreak occurred in a laboratory technician at a U.S. Naval Medical Research Center in Peru.
- The potential for transmission to staff and the non-human primate (NHP) colony necessitated immediate intervention.
Observation:
- 81% of 106 staff members had close contact with the infected individual.
- Only 7% of exposed staff had received the MMR vaccine, and 18% of potentially susceptible individuals lacked immunity.
- No secondary human cases were reported, and NHP colony access was restricted.
Findings:
- A swift occupational health response, including interviews and IgG testing, identified susceptible individuals.
- All identified susceptible staff were vaccinated with the MMR vaccine.
- The implemented measures successfully prevented further mumps transmission within the facility.
Implications:
- Demonstrates the critical importance of rapid and comprehensive occupational health strategies in controlling infectious disease outbreaks in research settings.
- Highlights the need for robust vaccination policies and surveillance to protect both human and animal populations in high-risk environments.
- Emphasizes the successful containment of mumps, safeguarding both personnel and valuable research animals.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Smallpox
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever
Steps in Outbreak Investigation

