Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Inference on treatment effects for targeted clinical trials under enrichment design
Jen-Pei Liu1, Jr-Rung Lin, Shein-Chung Chow
1Division of Biometry, Department of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. jpliu@ntu.edu.tw
Abstract:
After completion of a human genome project, the disease targets at molecular level can be identified. As a result, treatment modality for molecular targets can be developed. In practice, targeted clinical trials are usually conducted for evaluation of the possibility and feasibility of the individualized treatment of patients. However, the accuracy of diagnostic devices for identification of such molecular targets is usually not perfect. Therefore, some of the patients enrolled in targeted clinical trials with a positive result by the diagnostic device might not have the specific molecular targets and hence the treatment effects of the targeted drugs estimated from targeted clinical trials could be biased for the patient population truly with the molecular targets. Under an enrichment design for targeted clinical trials, we propose to use the EM algorithm and bootstrap method for obtaining the inference of the treatment effects of the targeted drugs in the patient population truly with molecular targets. A simulation study was conducted to empirically investigate the bias and variability of the proposed estimator and the size and power of the proposed testing method. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed estimator is unbiased with adequate precision and the confidence interval can provide satisfactory coverage probability. In addition, the proposed testing procedure can adequately control the size with sufficient power. A practical example illustrates the utility of the proposed method.
Insights
This study introduces a new method to accurately estimate targeted drug effectiveness in clinical trials, even with imperfect diagnostic tests. The approach ensures unbiased results for patients truly benefiting from the treatment.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Genomics
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Human genome project enables molecular target identification for personalized medicine.
- Targeted clinical trials evaluate individualized treatments but face diagnostic accuracy limitations.
- Imperfect diagnostics can bias treatment effect estimates in targeted trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a statistical method for unbiased estimation of targeted drug effects.
- To address bias in targeted clinical trials caused by inaccurate diagnostic devices.
- To provide reliable inference for patient populations with specific molecular targets.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm and bootstrap method.
- Employed an enrichment design for targeted clinical trials.
- Conducted simulation studies to assess estimator bias, variability, and testing procedure performance.
Main Results:
- The proposed estimator demonstrated unbiasedness with adequate precision.
- Confidence intervals achieved satisfactory coverage probability.
- The testing procedure effectively controlled statistical size and exhibited sufficient power.
Conclusions:
- The proposed statistical method accurately estimates targeted drug effects in patient populations with molecular targets.
- The approach mitigates bias introduced by imperfect diagnostic devices in clinical trials.
- Simulation and practical examples confirm the method's utility and reliability.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
