Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expanding <sup>68</sup>Ga radiolabeling capacity: off-label use of PSMA-11 single vial cold kits through aliquoting and dual generator utilization.

EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry·2026
Same author

Evidence-based team intervention to reduce diagnostic errors in anaemia and CKD diagnoses in primary care: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster RCT.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Optimising the care pathway of febrile children via capillary C-reactive protein assay in primary care: the CRP-CAP cluster randomised stepped-wedge study protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Thrombin generation reference values using the ST Genesia and STG-Thromboscreen assay in pregnant women.

Thrombosis research·2025
Same author

Effect of Anorexia Nervosa on Volumetric Bone Mineral Density.

Calcified tissue international·2025
Same author

Recommendations on biomarker assay validation (BAV) in tissues by GCC.

Bioanalysis·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
08:04

Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis

Published on: March 11, 2017

Data acquisition analysis for femoral morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Vincent Boudousq1, Enrique Nalda, Enric Jaegler

  • 1Service de Médecine Nucléaire et de Biophysique, CHU Nîmes, Hôpital Carémeau, Avenue du Professeur Debré, 30900 Nîmes, France. vincent.boudousq@chu-nimes.fr

Journal of Clinical Densitometry : the Official Journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
|February 3, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study compared single-energy X-ray and bone mineral density (BMD) images for femoral morphometry. Both image types are useful for clinical evaluation, with single-energy X-ray showing slightly better reproducibility.

More Related Videos

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

Longitudinal Evaluation of Mouse Hind Limb Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury using Novel, in vivo, Methodology
10:39

Longitudinal Evaluation of Mouse Hind Limb Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury using Novel, in vivo, Methodology

Published on: December 7, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
08:04

Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis

Published on: March 11, 2017

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
07:56

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts

Published on: January 29, 2018

Longitudinal Evaluation of Mouse Hind Limb Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury using Novel, in vivo, Methodology
10:39

Longitudinal Evaluation of Mouse Hind Limb Bone Loss After Spinal Cord Injury using Novel, in vivo, Methodology

Published on: December 7, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Orthopedics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Bone mineral density (BMD) is a key factor in hip fracture risk.
  • Femoral geometry and fall propensity also influence fracture risk.
  • Dual-energy X-ray densitometers can produce single-energy X-ray or BMD images.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate which image type (single-energy X-ray or BMD) offers better detection for femoral morphometry measurements.
  • To compare spatial resolution, contrast, and noise between the two image types.
  • To assess the reproducibility of morphometric measurements using both imaging techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated spatial resolution, contrast, and noise for both image types.
  • Utilized a contrast-detail phantom for visual analysis.
  • Assessed hip morphometric measurements and the Singh Index by three observers on both image types.
  • Computed intra-, inter-, and global reproducibility for measurements.

Main Results:

  • Spatial resolution was identical between single-energy X-ray and BMD images.
  • BMD images had better contrast but higher noise.
  • Single-energy X-ray images demonstrated superior object detection with a contrast-detail phantom.
  • Reproducibility of measurements was slightly better with single-energy X-ray images, though not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Both single-energy X-ray and BMD images are clinically useful for femoral morphometric evaluation.
  • While image quality metrics differ, neither imaging technique showed a statistically significant difference in measurement reproducibility.
  • Single-energy X-ray images may offer a slight advantage in measurement reproducibility for femoral morphometry.