Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Four studies comparing the Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor complex figures.

T N Tombaugh1, A M Hubley

  • 1Psychology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in social participation between individuals who do and do not attend brain injury drop-in centres: a preliminary study.

Brain injury·2011
Same author

The effects of list difficulty and modality of presentation on a computerized version of the Paced Serial Addition Test (PSAT).

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2004
Same author

The Adjusting-Paced Serial Addition Test (Adjusting-PSAT): thresholds for speed of information processing as a function of stimulus modality and problem complexity.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same author

Depression and the Test of Memory Malingering.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same author

Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same author

Rates of forgetting on three measures of verbal learning using retention intervals ranging from 20 min to 62 days.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2001

The Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor complex figures yield similar constructional scores but differ in memory recall. The Taylor figure shows superior memory performance across various conditions, cautioning against their use as equivalent memory assessment tools.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The Rey-Osterrieth (R-O) and Taylor complex figures are widely used in neuropsychological assessments.
  • Evaluating their equivalence in assessing constructional abilities and memory is crucial for accurate cognitive evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the R-O and Taylor complex figures yield equivalent scores on constructional and memory tasks.
  • To determine the reliability of these figures across different retention intervals, learning paradigms, and scoring systems.

Main Methods:

  • Four studies were conducted comparing the R-O and Taylor figures.
  • Performance was assessed using immediate, 20-minute, and 1-month recall conditions.
  • Both incidental and intentional learning paradigms were employed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Itemized and clinical neuropsychological scoring systems were utilized.
  • Main Results:

    • Both figures produced equivalent scores for constructional (copy) tasks.
    • The Taylor figure consistently yielded significantly higher scores on memory recall tests.
    • This memory performance difference was robust across all tested retention conditions, learning paradigms, and scoring methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The R-O and Taylor figures are not equivalent for assessing memory functions.
    • Their use as interchangeable tools for evaluating recovery or treatment effectiveness in mnemonic processes is cautioned against.
    • The findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate figures for specific cognitive assessments, particularly in test-retest scenarios.