Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Coronary artery bypass grafting with a minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit: a prospective, randomized trial
Marc P Sakwa1, Robert W Emery, Francis L Shannon
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oaks, Mich, USA.
Insights
A minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit significantly reduces blood loss and transfusion needs during coronary artery bypass grafting. This innovative approach offers improved patient outcomes with less hemodilution and fewer blood products required.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Medical Device Technology
- Patient Blood Management
Background:
- Standard cardiopulmonary bypass circuits can lead to significant hemodilution and blood loss.
- Minimizing cardiopulmonary bypass circuit components may mitigate these adverse effects.
- Optimizing bypass circuits is crucial for improving surgical outcomes and reducing transfusion requirements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare blood loss and transfusion rates between a minimized and a standard cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.
- To evaluate the impact of circuit design on patient hemodynamics and laboratory parameters.
- To determine the clinical benefits of a minimized bypass circuit in coronary artery bypass grafting.
Main Methods:
- Randomized trial involving 199 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Comparison between a standard circuit and the Medtronic Resting Heart Circuit (minimized).
- Laboratory parameters (hemoglobin, platelet count) and chest tube drainage were meticulously monitored.
Main Results:
- The minimized circuit group exhibited higher hematocrit and platelet counts.
- Significantly lower chest tube drainage was observed in the minimized circuit cohort.
- Fewer red blood cell units were transfused in patients receiving the minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.
Conclusions:
- A minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit leads to less hemodilution and platelet consumption.
- This approach results in reduced post-operative blood loss and lower red blood cell usage.
- The minimized circuit offers advantageous outcomes in cardiac surgery.
Objective:
The study was designed to determine differences in blood loss and transfusion associated with a minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit versus a standard bypass circuit.
Methods:
From February 2005 through April 2006, 199 patients were randomized to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass circuit (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn) or a minimized bypass circuit, the Medtronic Resting Heart Circuit. Laboratory perimeters (hemoglobin and platelet count), were measured at baseline, after initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, and on intensive care unit admission. Lowest values recorded were noted. Blood administration was controlled by study-specific protocol orders, (transfusion for hemoglobin <8mg%). Patient demographic data were retrieved from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Blood product administration was recorded during hospital admission, and chest tube drainage as total output collected from operating room to discontinuation. Continuous variables were tested with a Wilcoxin rank test, and categoric variables with X(2) and Fisher's exact tests.
Results:
Hematocrit, equivalent at baseline, was higher in minimized circuit cohort at lowest point during cariopulmonary bypass (31.5% +/- 3.9% vs. 25.5% +/- 3.7%), after protamine (31.6% +/- 3.9% vs 29.2% +/- 3.7%), and on intensive care unit arrival (35.2% +/- 4.1% vs 31.8% +/- 3.5%, P < .001). Similarly, platelet count was higher in minimized circuit group on intensive care unit arrival, as was lowest platelet count recorded (170 x 10(3) +/- 48 cells/mm(3) vs 107 x 10(3) +/- 28 cells/mm(3), P < .0001). Time to extubation was shorter in minimized circuit group (848 +/- 737 minutes vs. 526 +/- 282 minutes, (P < .01), and total chest tube drainage was lower (1124 +/- 647 mL vs. 506 +/- 214 mL, P < .01). Fewer red blood cells (148 vs 19 units) were given in minimized circuit group (P < .0001).
Conclusions:
A minimized cardiopulmonary bypass circuit provides less hemodilution, platelet consumption, chest tube output and lower post-operative blood loss than standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Red blood cell usage was also less. All differences are advantageous.

