Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

10:17
Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: echocardiographic vs semiautomatic device algorithms
Matteo Anselmino1, Marina Antolini, Claudia Amellone
1Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Unit, San Giovanni Battista, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Italy. matt.ans@alice.it
Congestive Heart Failure (Greenwich, Conn.)
|February 4, 2009
Summary
Optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is crucial for heart failure patients. A new intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) method for setting atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays shows comparable results to echocardiography (ECHO).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Individualized optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is vital for managing congestive heart failure (CHF).
- Accurate determination of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays is essential for effective CRT.
- Current methods for delay optimization often rely on Doppler echocardiography (ECHO).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a novel intracardiac electrogram (IEGM)-based method with the established ECHO-based method for calculating optimal AV and VV delays in CRT.
- To assess the reliability and comparability of IEGM-derived delay settings versus ECHO-derived settings.
Main Methods:
- Ten male patients with CHF, implanted with St Jude Medical CRT devices, participated in the study.
- Both IEGM and ECHO-based methods were used to determine optimal AV and VV delays.
- Statistical analysis was performed to compare the delay values obtained from the two methods.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was found between IEGM and ECHO methods for optimal AV delay (126.8±22.7 vs 127.3±19.8, P=.987).
- A strong correlation was observed between IEGM and ECHO methods for optimal VV delay (r²=0.78, P<.001), with IEGM suggesting 35±27.6 and ECHO suggesting 21.31±24.31.
- The IEGM-based method demonstrated high comparability with the ECHO-based method for CRT delay optimization.
Conclusions:
- Preliminary findings suggest that an IEGM-based method is a reliable alternative to ECHO for optimizing AV and VV delays in CRT.
- This IEGM method may offer a more efficient or accessible approach to CRT optimization.
- Further research with larger cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings.
