Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Nucleoside Triphosphates - From Synthesis to Biochemical Characterization
Published on: April 3, 2014
Y-Family DNA polymerases may use two different dNTP shapes for insertion: a hypothesis and its implications
Sushil Chandani1, Edward L Loechler
1Biology Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Abstract:
Chemicals and radiation can damage DNA leading to the formation of adducts/lesions, which - if not removed by DNA repair pathways - usually block replicative DNA polymerases (DNAPs). To overcome such potentially lethal blockage, cells have lesion bypass DNAPs, which are often in the Y-Family and include several classes. One class includes human DNAP kappa and E. coli DNAP IV, and they insert dCTP in the non-mutagenic pathway opposite [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG, which is the major adduct formed by the environmental carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene. Another class includes hDNAP eta and ecDNAP V, and they insert dATP opposite [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG in the dominant G-->T mutagenic pathway. Herein we develop a hypothesis for why the IV/kappa-class preferentially does cellular dCTP insertion. On the minor groove side of the active site, Y-Family DNAPs have a cleft/hole that can be analyzed based on an analogy to a "chimney." Our models of DNAP IV show a large chimney opening from which the pyrene of [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG can protrude, which allows canonical adduct-dG:dCTP pairing. In contrast, our models of DNAP V have small chimney openings that forces adduct-dG downward in the active site such that canonical adduct-dG:dCTP pairing is not possible. Based on X-ray structures, sequence alignment and our modeled structures of Y-Family DNAPs, chimney opening size seems primarily controlled by one amino acid ("flue-handle"), which dictates whether nearby amino acids ("flue") plug the chimney or not. Based on this analysis, a correlation is apparent: the flue is closed in V/eta-class DNAPs giving small chimney openings, while the flue is open for the IV/kappa-class giving large chimney openings. Secondarily, a hypothesis is developed for why the V/eta-class might preferentially do cellular dATP insertion opposite [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG: the small chimney forces adduct-dG lower in the active site, possibly leading to catalysis using a non-canonical dNTP shape that permits syn-adenine:adduct-dG base pairing. In summary, a hypothesize is developed that the pyrene moiety of [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG protrudes from the large chimney opening of DNAP IV, thus permitting canonical dCTP:adduct-dG pairing, while the small chimney opening of DNAP V forces [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG lower down in the active site, in which syn-adenine can pair with adduct-dG via a non-canonical dNTP shape.
Insights
DNA polymerases (DNAPs) bypass DNA damage using different strategies. Y-family DNAPs IV/kappa insert dCTP, while DNAPs V/eta insert dATP opposite benzo[a]pyrene adducts, a difference explained by active site chimney size.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
- Genetics
Background:
- DNA damage from chemicals and radiation can block replicative DNA polymerases (DNAPs).
- Lesion bypass DNAPs, primarily from the Y-Family, are crucial for overcoming these blocks.
- Different Y-family DNAP classes exhibit distinct mechanisms for bypassing DNA adducts, such as those formed by benzo[a]pyrene.
Purpose of the Study:
- To hypothesize the mechanistic basis for differential dCTP insertion by DNAP IV/kappa compared to dATP insertion by DNAP V/eta opposite the benzo[a]pyrene-N(2)-dG adduct.
- To investigate the role of the active site 'chimney' structure in Y-family DNAP substrate selection.
Main Methods:
- Computational modeling of Y-family DNAP active sites.
- Analysis of X-ray structures and sequence alignments of Y-family DNAPs.
- Hypothesis development based on structural and sequence data.
Main Results:
- DNAP IV/kappa possess a large active site 'chimney' allowing the benzo[a]pyrene adduct to protrude, facilitating canonical dCTP pairing.
- DNAP V/eta have smaller 'chimneys,' forcing the adduct lower, hindering canonical pairing and potentially enabling non-canonical dATP pairing.
- The 'chimney' size is primarily dictated by a single amino acid residue, the 'flue-handle'.
Conclusions:
- The size of the active site 'chimney' in Y-family DNAPs is a key determinant of their ability to bypass DNA adducts.
- DNAP IV/kappa's large chimney enables non-mutagenic bypass via dCTP insertion.
- DNAP V/eta's small chimney may lead to mutagenic bypass via dATP insertion, with structural constraints influencing base pairing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Proofreading
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase Enzyme
Proofreading
Translesion DNA Polymerases
TLS polymerases are found in all three domains of life - archaea, bacteria, and eukaryotes. Of the different classes of TLS polymerases, members of the Y family are fitted with specialized structures that...
PCR
DNA as a Genetic Template
Lagging Strand Synthesis
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...

