Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits

Donna R Halloran1, J Michael Hardin, Terry C Wall

  • 1Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Saint Louis University, 1465 S Grand Blvd., St Louis, MO 63110, USA. dhallor2@slu.edu

Insights

Pure-tone audiometry hearing screening in primary care shows low sensitivity (50%) and poor follow-up rates, questioning its value in well-child visits. This impacts early detection of hearing loss in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Audiology
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Hearing loss is a significant concern in pediatric populations.
  • Primary care settings are crucial for early detection of health issues in children.
  • Pure-tone audiometry is a common screening tool for hearing loss.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of pure-tone audiometry for hearing screening in primary care.
  • To assess the effectiveness of hearing screening protocols within pediatric practices.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective cohort study was conducted across eight pediatric practices.
  • 1061 children aged 3-19 years underwent pure-tone audiometry screening.
  • Formal audiologic evaluations served as the gold standard for diagnosis.

Main Results:

  • The sensitivity of pure-tone audiometry was 50%, and specificity was 78%.
  • Only 25% of referred children completed formal audiology evaluations.
  • Hearing loss was identified in 3% of children who passed screening and 6% who did not.

Conclusions:

  • The study questions the utility of pure-tone audiometry screening in well-child visits due to low sensitivity and inadequate follow-up.
  • Improving referral completion rates and considering alternative screening methods may be necessary.
  • The findings highlight challenges in implementing effective hearing screening in primary care.
Abstract