Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Measuring Deformability and Red Cell Heterogeneity in Blood by Ektacytometry
Published on: January 12, 2018
[Hematocrit measurement: comparison of conductimetry to microcentrifugation]
M-F Daurès1, C Combescure, C Demattei
1Laboratoire de biochimie, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier. mf-daures@chu-montpellier.fr
In general, blood gas analysers can also determine the value of haematocrite by measuring the blood's conductivity. The question to ask is whether this value is reliable. In this study, hematocrit obtained via conductivity from 6 different pieces of equipment were compared with those measured using the gold standard method, which is microcentrifugation. By interpreting the results of 320 arterial blood samples taken in the intensive care unit DAR "B" we can see that the reliability between two measurements on the same piece of equipment is very good, in general > 0.95 whatever the equipment. The reliability between the means of the two measurements and the gold standard is slightly lower but remains very satisfactory, most often between 0.8 and 0.9. The Gem Premier 3000 (IL) analyser and the Roche OMNI S gave the best reliability compared with centrifugation. The Spearman coefficients between the mean values of the analysers and those of centrifugation were high, with the exception of the Rapidpoint 405. They are all statistically different from zero (p<0.0001).
In general, blood gas analysers can also determine the value of haematocrite by measuring the blood's conductivity. The question to ask is whether this value is reliable. In this study, hematocrit obtained via conductivity from 6 different pieces of equipment were compared with those measured using the gold standard method, which is microcentrifugation. By interpreting the results of 320 arterial blood samples taken in the intensive care unit DAR "B" we can see that the reliability between two measurements on the same piece of equipment is very good, in general > 0.95 whatever the equipment. The reliability between the means of the two measurements and the gold standard is slightly lower but remains very satisfactory, most often between 0.8 and 0.9. The Gem Premier 3000 (IL) analyser and the Roche OMNI S gave the best reliability compared with centrifugation. The Spearman coefficients between the mean values of the analysers and those of centrifugation were high, with the exception of the Rapidpoint 405. They are all statistically different from zero (p<0.0001).
Related Concept Videos
Centrifugation
Coulometry: Overview
Controlled-Current Coulometry: Coulometric Titration
The fundamental requirements for coulometric titrations are (1) 100% efficiency in the reagent-generating electrode reaction and (2) a stoichiometric and preferably rapid reaction between the generated...
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods

