Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Refined obesity, smoking exposure, and lipid metrics in mortality risk assessment: a nationwide cohort analysis.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors With Incident Gout Risk: A Population-Based Comparative Cohort Study With Genetic Evidence From Mendelian Randomisation.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2026
Same author

Resistin signaling via NF-κB pathway plays a key role in obesity-induced and -aggravated asthma.

Life sciences·2026
Same author

Differential Effect of Early Intervention for Moderate Aortic Stenosis by Extravalvular Damage.

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Heavy metal-induced proteomic profiles associated with disease risk in environmentally vulnerable populations" [J Hazard Mater 511 (2026) 142267].

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Heavy metal-induced proteomic profiles associated with disease risk in environmentally vulnerable populations.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same journal

Applying Bayesian Multivariable Mendelian Randomisation to Prioritise Candidate Causal Traits From High-Dimensional Data: Illustration From Estimation of the Effect of Maternal Metabolites on Offspring Birthweight.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Individualized Bayesian Inference Identifies Novel Genetic Variants for Parkinson's Disease.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

DRIVE v3: Command Line Application for Identity-by-Descent Haplotype Clustering in Large Biobank Scale Data.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Deep Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Translating Cancer Dependency Maps From Cell Lines to Breast Cancer Tumor Genomics.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Polygenic Risk Scores for Incident Dementia in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Outcome and Exposure Polygenic Risk Scores Can Help Reduce Information Bias and Selection Bias in Regression Estimates From Biobank Data.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Phase uncertainty in case-control association studies.

Sungho Won1, Sulgi Kim, Robert C Elston

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Genetic Epidemiology
|February 6, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares methods for analyzing genetic linkage disequilibrium (LD) in disease association studies. The LD contrast test is recommended based on marker density and population factors, offering a powerful alternative to allele frequency differences.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Population Genetics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Genetic Epidemiology

Background:

  • Genetic association studies aim to identify links between genetic markers and diseases.
  • Analysis typically involves comparing allele frequencies, Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium (HWD), and linkage disequilibrium (LD) between cases and controls.
  • Estimating LD parameters is challenging due to unknown haplotype phase.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare methods for handling phase uncertainty in linkage disequilibrium (LD) contrast tests.
  • To evaluate the validity and efficiency of different phase-handling methods under various population conditions, including Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium (HWD).
  • To confirm results across allele frequency differences, HWD, and LD parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three methods for phase uncertainty: using the most probable haplotype pair, a weighted average of haplotypes, or composite LD (which requires no phase information).
  • Evaluation of method performance based on validity and efficiency.
  • Assessment of the impact of population HWD on method performance.

Main Results:

  • When linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers is high, using the most probable haplotypes or a weighted average of haplotypes for the LD contrast test is recommended.
  • Conversely, when LD between markers is not high, the LD contrast test utilizing composite LD is advised.
  • Allele frequency differences are generally the most informative test, except for recessive diseases.

Conclusions:

  • The LD contrast test can be more powerful than allele frequency differences, particularly with dense marker data.
  • The choice of method for handling phase uncertainty in LD analysis depends on marker density and LD levels.
  • This research provides guidance for optimizing genetic association study designs and analyses.