Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: how reliable is the gold standard?
E van Os1, J De Schryver, R H J Houwen
1Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Insights
Interobserver variability in esophageal pH monitoring was 18%, often due to interpretation issues. Post-test calibration and probe assessment can improve agreement in diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Pediatric Medicine
- Diagnostic Techniques
Background:
- Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) diagnosis relies on esophageal pH monitoring.
- Interobserver variability can impact diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the extent of interobserver variability in esophageal pH monitoring.
- To identify the causes of this variability in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 72 pediatric patients undergoing esophageal pH monitoring.
- Evaluation of diagnostic interpretations by multiple observers.
Main Results:
- An 18% interobserver variability was observed.
- Variability stemmed from disagreements on registration duration, probe placement, artifacts, and baseline pH drift.
Conclusions:
- Post-test calibration and electrode position assessment can mitigate variability.
- A lack of clear definitions for monitoring artifacts persists.
- Fair agreement (kappa coefficient of 0.70) was found in pH study interpretation.
Objective:
To investigate the causes and degree of interobserver variability in esophageal pH monitoring for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.
Methods:
This retrospective study included all children (n = 72) who underwent pH monitoring during 1 year at Maxima Medical Centre in Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Results:
An interobserver variability of 18% was found. Variability was caused by differences in opinion about the duration of registration, doubts about probe position, artifacts and drift of baseline pH.
Conclusions:
Most of these problems can be eliminated by posttest calibration and assessment of the pH electrode position. However, a clear definition of monitoring artifacts is lacking. This study shows that mutual agreement in the interpretation of pH studies was fair (kappa coefficient of 0.70).
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more similar...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...

