Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wild social behavior differs following experimental loss of vision in social hermit crabs.

Die Naturwissenschaften·2023
Same author

Individualism versus collective movement during travel.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Animal architecture.

Current biology : CB·2021
Same author

Social conquest of land: Sea-to-land changes in shell architecture and body morphology, with consequences for social evolution.

Arthropod structure & development·2021
Same author

Shells as 'extended architecture': to escape isolation, social hermit crabs choose shells with the right external architecture.

Animal cognition·2020
Same author

Finding a home in the noise: cross-modal impact of anthropogenic vibration on animal search behaviour.

Biology open·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

How often do animals lie about their intentions? An experimental test.

Mark E Laidre1

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. mlaidre@princeton.edu

The American Naturalist
|February 10, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hermit crabs rarely lie about their aggressive intentions. Experiments show their threats accurately predict their behavior, whether facing retreat or confrontation.

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
08:59

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs

Published on: October 13, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
08:59

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs

Published on: October 13, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Animal Communication
  • Evolutionary Game Theory

Background:

  • Animal conflicts often involve displays signaling future behavior.
  • Theoretical models predicted signals of intent would be easily faked.
  • Empirical evidence suggests some animals do signal intentions honestly, but the extent remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally investigate the honesty of intent signals in an invertebrate.
  • To quantify the frequency of falsified intent displays in hermit crabs (Pagurus bernhardus).
  • To differentiate genuine intent signaling from potential noise in recipient-response dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Interactive-model experiments were conducted with hermit crabs.
  • Crabs were given opportunities to display aggressive threats towards an approaching model.
  • Subsequent crab behavior was analyzed after the model either fled or probed aggressively.

Main Results:

  • Discrepancies between advertised intent and subsequent actions were infrequent.
  • When the model retreated, most crabs remained stationary, irrespective of prior threats.
  • When the model probed, crabs that had threatened stood their ground, while non-threateners retreated.

Conclusions:

  • Hermit crabs exhibit a high degree of honesty in their threat displays.
  • Threats reliably predict subsequent aggressive behavior, particularly when challenged.
  • Prior observations of 'lying about intent' may stem from uncontrolled variables and recipient responses.