Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Representativeness and conjoint probability.

I Gavanski1, D R Roskos-Ewoldsen

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|August 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"If only I weren't" versus "if only I hadn't": distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1994
Same author

Natural sample spaces and uncertain belief.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1992
Same author

On the orienting value of attitudes: attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1992
Same journal

Outgroup friendships and social influence in the development of adolescent attitudes toward secondary outgroups.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The impact of "relational" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Is my loneliness killing me? Effects of loneliness and social isolation on transitions between cognitive status categories and death.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Listening across the divide: High-quality listening promotes speakers' state well-being through basic psychological need satisfaction during disagreements.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Morality cut both ways: The role of cognition and emotion in attitude moralization and demoralization.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The predictive validity of vocational interests for life outcomes across adulthood.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
See all related articles

People often commit the conjunction fallacy, overestimating combined event probability. This study finds incorrect probability combination rules, not just representativeness, are the primary cause of this common cognitive bias.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • The conjunction fallacy, where a conjunction of events is judged more probable than its components, is a common cognitive bias.
  • This fallacy has been attributed to the representativeness heuristic and faulty probability combination rules.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate the contributions of representativeness and probability combination rules to the conjunction fallacy.
  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms driving errors in probabilistic judgment.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to contrast the influence of representativeness and probability combination rules.
  • Participants' judgments of event probabilities were analyzed in relation to these two factors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The conjunction fallacy primarily resulted from the application of incorrect rules for combining probabilities.
  • The representativeness heuristic played a role mainly by influencing the perceived probabilities of individual component events.

Conclusions:

  • Incorrect probability combination rules are the main driver of the conjunction fallacy, even in representativeness-focused scenarios.
  • Findings refine the understanding of the representativeness heuristic and the relationship between similarity and probability in judgment errors.