Related Experiment Videos
The Rationality/Emotional Defensiveness Scale--I. Internal structure and stability
1Health Sciences Program, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
|January 1, 1991
Summary
Emotional repression and denial predict cancer mortality. The Rationality/Emotional Defensiveness (R/ED) Scale shows reliable psychometric properties, with distinct
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Oncology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Previous research linked emotional repression/denial to cancer mortality.
- The Rationality/Emotional Defensiveness (R/ED) Scale was developed to assess these traits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the psychometric properties of the R/ED Scale.
- To examine gender and age differences in emotional defensiveness and rationality.
- To explore potential interactions between psychological constructs, gender, age, and cancer status.
Main Methods:
- A 27-year follow-up study of the Western Collaborative Group Study.
- Involved 1236 males and 863 females with a mean age of 71.8 and 68.5 years, respectively.
- Psychometric analyses including interitem consistency and factor analysis of the R/ED Scale.
Main Results:
- The R/ED Scale demonstrated high interitem consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.77-0.78).
- Two stable factors emerged: 'Anti-emotionality' (27% variance) and 'Rationality' (21% variance).
- Significant gender differences were found in R/ED scores, and potential interactions with cancer status and age were suggested.
Conclusions:
- The R/ED Scale is a psychometrically sound measure for assessing emotional defensiveness and rationality.
- Emotional repression/denial is not a unidimensional construct, as suggested by previous research.
- Age and gender significantly influence these psychological constructs and their relationship with cancer status.