Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Respiration-action coupling during self-initiated action: Evidence for action alignment with ongoing breathing.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Task-induced transient depersonalization- and derealization-like experiences: a comparative examination of mirror gazing and fixed attention tasks.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

Predictive processing in time perception: Assessing prediction error minimization in the sub-second range.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

Attentional resource allocation in the early stages of motor skill learning.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Differential modulation of discriminability and emotion on early and late deviant processing in the three-stimulus oddball paradigm.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Not All Rules Are Equal: Rare Conditional Rules Shape Behaviour but Yield to Global Probability in Passive Listening.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm.

Motohiro Kimura1, Jun'ichi Katayama, Hideki Ohira

  • 1Department of Psychology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. m-kimura@nagoya-u.jp

Psychophysiology
|February 12, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that early negative ERPs in visual oddball tasks reflect refractory effects, while later negativities indicate change detection, specifically the visual mismatch negativity. This clarifies the brain

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Visual oddball paradigms commonly elicit a posterior negative event-related potential (ERP) around 100–250 ms when deviant stimuli are presented.
  • The specific neural processes underlying this negative ERP remain incompletely understood, necessitating further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate the underlying neural mechanisms of early (100–150 ms) and late (200–250 ms) negativities observed in visual oddball tasks.
  • To investigate the roles of refractory effects and memory-comparison-based change detection in generating these ERP components.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an equiprobable sequence (20% probability for each of five bar orientations) as a control condition.
  • Employed an oddball sequence with two closely oriented stimuli (20% deviant, 80% standard).
  • Analyzed event-related potentials (ERPs) comparing deviant to standard and deviant to control stimuli.

Main Results:

  • Deviant vs. standard stimuli elicited two negativities: one at 100–150 ms (no hemispheric dominance) and another at 200–250 ms (right hemispheric dominance).
  • Deviant vs. control stimuli elicited a single negativity at 200–250 ms with right hemispheric dominance.

Conclusions:

  • The early negativity (100–150 ms) likely reflects a refractory effect of neural processing.
  • The late negativity (200–250 ms) is associated with memory-comparison-based change detection, consistent with the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN).