Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results
Saad A Al-Harbi1, Albert Y T Sun
1Retal Clinic, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. amharbi@hotmail.com
Implant Dentistry
|February 13, 2009
Summary
Stereolithographic surgical templates accurately guide dental implant placement, with minimal deviations in angulation and entrance point. This technology shows promise for precise surgical outcomes in implant dentistry.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Surgical Navigation
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Accurate dental implant placement is crucial for successful prosthetic rehabilitation.
- Stereolithographic surgical templates offer a method for pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance.
- Evaluating the precision of these templates is essential for clinical adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the accuracy of implant angulations and entrance points using stereolithographic surgical templates.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of coordinate measure machine (CMM) in measuring implant placement accuracy.
- To determine the reliability of stereolithographic templates in transferring planned positions to the surgical field.
Main Methods:
- Forty implants were placed in edentulous jaws using stereolithographic surgical templates.
- Implant angulations (mesio-distal and bucco-lingual) and entrance points were evaluated using CMM.
- The central axis of planned and actual implants was determined by locating three points.
- Data were analyzed using the paired t-test.
Main Results:
- Mean mesio-distal angle deviation was 0.7 +/- 5.02 degrees; mean bucco-lingual deviation was 0.46 +/- 4.43 degrees.
- 88% and 91% of implants had <7 degrees angle deviation in mesio-distal and bucco-lingual planes, respectively.
- Mean entrance point deviation was 0.2 +/- 0.72 mm, with 85% within 1 mm of the planned position.
Conclusions:
- Stereolithographic surgical templates demonstrate sufficient accuracy in transferring planned implant angulations and entrance points.
- CMM is a reliable tool for evaluating implant placement accuracy.
- Further clinical studies with larger patient cohorts are recommended to validate these findings.
