Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

Synthesis of new DNA molecules starts when DNA polymerase links nucleotides together in a sequence that is complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity for the correct base to ensure fidelity in DNA replication. The DNA polymerase furthermore proofreads during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.Errors during Replication Are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase EnzymeGenomic DNA is synthesized in...
The Carbon Cycle01:14

The Carbon Cycle

Carbon is the basis of all organic matter on Earth, and is recycled through the ecosystem in two primary processes: one in which carbon is exchanged among living organisms, and one in which carbon is cycled over long periods of time through fossilized organic remains, weathering of rocks, and volcanic activity. Human activities, including increased agricultural practices and the burning of fossil fuels, has greatly affected the balance of the natural carbon cycle.
Shearing Stresses in a Beam: Problem Solving01:14

Shearing Stresses in a Beam: Problem Solving

A cantilever beam with a rectangular cross-section under distributed and point loads experiences shearing stresses. The analysis begins by identifying the loads acting on the beam. Then, the reactions at the beam's fixed end are calculated using equilibrium equations. The vertical reaction is a combination of the distributed and point loads, while the moment reaction is the sum of their moments. The shear force distribution along the beam, resulting from these loads, is established by creating...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Bioethics recommendations regarding informed consent in people with disabilities].

Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social·2021
Same author

Attitudes about principle of autonomy in Hispanic patients from a dynamic early rheumatoid arthritis cohort.

Clinical and experimental rheumatology·2019
Same author

Reduced quality of life impacts knowledge and type of informed consent in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Clinical and experimental rheumatology·2018
Same author

[Bioethical analysis in pregnancy's Jehova Witnesess and transfusion refusal].

Cuadernos de bioetica : revista oficial de la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y Etica Medica·2010
Same author

[A lack of ethics in the World Medical Association and in other international organisms?].

Gaceta medica de Mexico·2005

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

[Credit problems on scientific article authorships: some solutions].

María de la Luz Casas-Martínez1

  • 1Departamento de Bioética, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Panamericana, Distrito Federal, México. mcasas@mx.up.mx

Revista Medica Del Instituto Mexicano Del Seguro Social
|February 14, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Scientific publication metrics can lead to authorship fraud and plagiarism. This article examines International Committee of Medical Journal Editors guidelines to improve transparency and prevent misconduct in multi-authored research.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Medical research ethics
  • Scientific publishing standards
  • Academic integrity

Context:

  • The increasing emphasis on publication quantity for scientific evaluation facilitates authorship abuses and fraud.
  • Multi-authorship in collaborative research projects introduces challenges, including intentional article alteration, misinformation, and plagiarism.
  • Disagreements within research teams create a stressful work environment, negatively impacting the investigation process.

Purpose:

  • To analyze the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' (ICMJE) recommendations regarding authorship in medical articles.
  • To define criteria for valid authorship and propose strategies to mitigate authorship-related problems.
  • To enhance transparency and ethical practices in scientific collaborations.

Summary:

  • The study critically evaluates ICMJE authorship guidelines in response to rising publication fraud and plagiarism in multi-authored research.
  • It addresses issues of intentional article manipulation and plagiarism, emphasizing the need for greater transparency in scientific collaborations.
  • Proposed solutions include mandatory author consent letters prior to publication, clear attribution of contributions, and limiting publications based on specific activity criteria.

Impact:

  • Promoting ethical authorship standards to uphold the integrity of scientific research.
  • Reducing instances of fraud, plagiarism, and misinformation in medical publications.
  • Fostering a more transparent and collaborative research environment through clear authorship guidelines.