Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Errors in Taping

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Non-contact monitoring of agitation and use of a sheltering device in patients with dementia in emergency departments: a feasibility study.

BMC psychiatry·2020

Same author

Functional requirements of critical care information systems (CCIS) from the users' perspective.

International journal of medical informatics·2018

Same author

Investigation of the Usability of Computerized Critical Care Information Systems in Germany.

Journal of intensive care medicine·2017

Same author

Design and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate the usability of computerized critical care information systems.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·2016

Same author

Integrated therapy safety management system.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Published on: October 1, 2007

[Medical device use errors].

Wolfgang Friesdorf¹, Ingo Marsolek

¹Lehrstuhl für Arbeitswissenschaft und Produktergonomie, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany. wolfgang.friesdorf@awb.tu-berlin.de

Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen

|February 14, 2009

Summary

Medical device use errors, often attributed to human failure, necessitate error-tolerant systems. A collaborative approach analyzing the entire medical treatment chain is key to future healthcare safety and efficiency.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Published on: October 1, 2007

Area of Science:

Human factors engineering
Medical device safety
Healthcare systems analysis

Background:

Medical devices are integral to patient care but can cause harm through use errors.
Human error is unavoidable in complex, time-pressured medical environments.
Current medical workplaces often lack holistic design, leading to usability issues.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the need for error-tolerant work systems in healthcare.
To advocate for a human engineering approach prioritizing technological solutions (TOP principle).
To emphasize the necessity of collaborative, iterative optimization of medical treatment processes.

Main Methods:

Analysis of human failure in medical device use.
Application of the TOP principle (Technological, Organizational, Person-related solutions).
Conceptualization of a simulated medical treatment chain platform (e.g., medilab V).

Main Results:

Error-prone usability concepts are often inadequately addressed by organizational or personal measures.
A lack of holistic workplace, process, and system concepts hinders safety.
Collaboration between producers, healthcare providers, and users is crucial for optimization.

Conclusions:

A joint platform for simulating the medical treatment chain is essential for identifying and mitigating risks.
Systematic analysis and iterative optimization are key to achieving a safe and efficient future healthcare system.
Addressing usability and system design is paramount to reducing medical errors.