Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Pacing lead inserted via the subclavian artery caused acute coronary syndrome
Peter Nordbeck1, Heiner Langenfeld, Axel Krein
1Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universität Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 2, Würzburg, Germany. nordbeck_p@medizin.uni-wuerzburg.de
Insights
A rare complication of pacemaker implantation, subclavian artery lead placement, can cause acute coronary syndrome. Successful lead removal is possible, with surgical extraction preferred for high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Device Complications
Background:
- Pacemaker implantation via the subclavian artery is a rare but serious complication.
- Lead malposition in the arterial system carries risks of cerebral thrombembolism and bleeding.
Observation:
- This case report details an acute coronary syndrome resulting from a pacing lead misplaced via the subclavian artery.
- The lead tip was positioned near the ostium of the left coronary artery.
Findings:
- Successful removal of the misplaced pacing lead was achieved.
- Literature review on subclavian artery lead complications and management was provided.
Implications:
- For long-standing leads without complications, conservative management with anticoagulation may be an option.
- Surgical lead extraction is recommended for patients with thrombembolic history or other indications for replacement.
Unlabelled:
Introduction of a cardiac pacing lead via the subclavian artery is a rare complication in the process of pacemaker implantation. Removal of the lead from the arterial system imposes an increased risk of cerebral thrombembolism and, in case of arterial puncture, an increased risk of bleeding.
Methods And Results:
Here we describe an acute coronary syndrome caused by a pacing lead inserted via the subclavian artery with the tip implanted close to the ostium of the left coronary artery. We further describe the successful removal of the lead and give a short overview of the literature.
Conclusion:
In cases where a pacemaker or ICD lead has already been placed in the left ventricle for an extended period of time and there is no indication for replacement like insufficient threshold levels, infection, or thrombembolic events, the lead can be left in place and the patient be treated with anticoagulants. In asymptomatic patients with additional indications for cardiac surgery simultaneous lead extraction should be considered. In patients with a history of thrombembolic events, or in patients with other indications for lead replacement, lead extraction should preferably be performed by cardiac surgery, rather than by percutaneous extraction.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction

