Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Environmental Dynamic Mechanical Analysis to Predict the Softening Behavior of Neural Implants
Published on: March 1, 2019
"Dial-an-ROI?" changing basic variables impacts cost trends in single-population pre-post ("DMAA type") savings
Iver A Juster1, Stephen N Rosenberg, Deeptimayee Senapati
1ActiveHealth Management, Sausalito, California, USA. ijuster@comcast.net
Disease management programs aim for cost savings, but proving them is hard without comparison groups. This study shows small changes in data analysis methods significantly alter cost trend results.
Area of Science:
- Health economics
- Healthcare management
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Disease management (DM) programs are intended to reduce healthcare costs by improving clinical outcomes.
- Demonstrating cost savings from DM programs is challenging, particularly without external comparison populations.
- Single-population methodologies often assume similar cost trends between participants (chronics) and non-participants (non-chronics) in the absence of DM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of key variable choices on the validity of single-population DM cost savings methodologies.
- To evaluate the assumption of identical baseline trends between chronic and non-chronic populations under varying analytical parameters.
Main Methods:
- Compared baseline cost trends for chronic (C) and non-chronic (NC) populations within a large telephonic DM program.
- Analyzed 16 combinations of 4 key variables: identification look-back frame, identification threshold, claims runout, and minimum eligibility.
- Assessed trends using annual qualification for 23 conditions affecting nearly 300,000 members.
Main Results:
- Variations in the 4 key variables significantly altered baseline C and NC trends.
- C trends ranged from 10.1% to 13.1%, while NC trends ranged from 5.2% to 12.8%.
- The most convergent C and NC trends (10.4% and 10.7%) were achieved with specific parameter settings (24-month look-back, high threshold, 6-month runout, 6-month eligibility).
Conclusions:
- Minor adjustments in analytical variables can substantially impact the perceived cost trends in single-population DM savings studies.
- Reporting baseline trends for both chronic and non-chronic groups, along with specified variable values, is crucial when external comparisons are unavailable.
- Utilizing plausibility metrics, such as hospitalizations, is recommended to validate DM program savings assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Carboxylic Acids to Methylesters: Alkylation using Diazomethane
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Regression Toward the Mean
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
