Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Primary PCI as the preferred reperfusion therapy in STEMI: it is a matter of time
C J Terkelsen1, E H Christiansen, J T Sørensen
1Department of Cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark. Christian_juhl_terkelsen@hotmail.com
Insights
Current guidelines suggest a 60-minute window for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This viewpoint advocates for an extended PPCI time window of 80-120 minutes, emphasizing its superiority for reperfusion.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Controversy exists regarding optimal timing for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Current guidelines recommend PPCI over fibrinolysis if the PCI-related delay is less than 60 minutes and presentation delay exceeds 3 hours.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing literature on PPCI time windows for STEMI patients.
- To propose revisions to current American and European guidelines regarding PPCI eligibility and timing.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies evaluating PPCI and fibrinolysis in STEMI.
- Analysis of time-dependent outcomes and logistical considerations for reperfusion strategies.
Main Results:
- Evidence supports an extended PCI-related delay of 80-120 minutes for PPCI.
- PPCI is identified as a superior reperfusion strategy, even for early presenters.
- The time-dependency of PPCI compared to fibrinolysis is questioned.
Conclusions:
- Guidelines for PPCI in STEMI should be revised to reflect evidence supporting longer acceptable delays.
- Optimal logistics involve prehospital diagnosis and direct transfer to 24/7 catheterization labs to maximize PPCI eligibility.
Abstract:
There is a continuing controversy about the acceptable time-window for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Recent American and European guidelines recommend PPCI if the delay in performing PPCI instead of administering fibrinolysis (PCI-related delay) is <60 min and the presentation delay is more than 3 h. Based on a review of the literature, this viewpoint recommends a revision of the guidelines. The evidence supports an acceptable PCI-related delay of 80-120 min and PPCI as the better reperfusion strategy also in the early incomers. Furthermore, the previous assumption that PPCI is less time-dependent than fibrinolysis is questioned. To maximise the number of patients with STEMI eligible for PPCI the optimal logistic may be to establish the diagnosis in the prehospital phase, to bypass local hospitals and re-route patients directly to catheterisation laboratories running 24/7.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
