Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

07:45
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Revision hip surgery using the CLS expansion shell.
Z Rozkydal1, P Janicek, V Havlicek
1Orthopaedic Department, St. Anna's Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. rozkydal@seznam.cz
Summary
The uncemented CLS expansion shell shows promise in revision hip surgery for aseptic loosening, offering improved clinical scores and 84% survivorship at 8.5 years. While 15% of cases required revision, it remains a viable option for complex acetabular defects.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Revision hip surgery addresses complications from primary hip replacements.
- Aseptic loosening of acetabular components is a common challenge.
- The CLS (Cormet Locking Shell) expansion shell is an uncemented option for acetabular reconstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the uncemented CLS expansion shell in revision hip surgery.
- To assess the survivorship and complication rates associated with this implant.
- To determine the efficacy of the CLS shell in cases with poor bone quality and acetabular defects.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 215 patients (230 hips) undergoing revision hip surgery with the CLS expansion shell between 1991 and 2000.
- Evaluation of 196 patients (211 hips) with failed acetabular components, including Paprosky defect classifications.
- Clinical outcomes assessed using Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scores and Harris Hip scores; radiological assessment via plain radiographs.
Main Results:
- Mean follow-up was 8.5 years. Clinical scores significantly improved (Merle d'Aubigné: 7.8 to 14.9; Harris Hip: 38.6 to 82.5).
- Osteointegration observed in 70.6% of hips. Clinical survivorship was 90% at 5 years and 84% at 8.5 years.
- Radiological survivorship was 78% at 5 years and 70% at 8.5 years. 15% of cases required a second revision due to complications.
Conclusions:
- The uncemented CLS expansion shell provides a viable alternative for revision hip surgery, particularly in patients with poor bone quality or acetabular defects.
- The implant demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes and acceptable long-term survivorship.
- Complication rates necessitate careful patient selection and surgical technique.