Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Extraction and Detection of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol in Water and Fish using High-Capacity Sorptive Extraction Probes and GC-MS
Published on: July 3, 2025
Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils using
Dani Zuazagoitia1, Esmeralda Millán, Rosa Garcia-Arrona
1Departamento de Química Aplicada, Facultad de Química, Universidad del País Vasco, Apdo. 1072, 20080, San Sebastián, Spain.
Abstract:
Two simple methods using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to a gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector were compared for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in soils. These compounds were included in the US Environmental Protection Agency's Priority Pollutants list. Direct hot water HS-SPME extraction and sonication organic extraction followed by HS-SPME were optimized using experimental designs. The first method was chosen for PAH determination. The validation of the proposed method was carried out by analyzing PAHs in the certified soil reference material RTC-CRM 123. The accuracy obtained for the PAHs was shown to be inside the prediction interval with the certified material. The optimized method was applied to the analysis of several superficial soils from Gipuzkoa (Basque Country, North Spain).
Related Concept Videos
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
SFC utilizes a supercritical fluid mobile phase,...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

