Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Simultaneous versus sequential optimal design for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models with FO and FOCE
J M McGree1, J A Eccleston, S B Duffull
1University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia. james.mcgree@qut.edu.au
This study compares design strategies for pharmacometric models, finding that sequential approaches may yield biased results. Simultaneous design and First Order Conditional Estimation are recommended for accurate parameter estimation in nonlinear mixed effects models.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacometrics
- Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models
- Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic (PKPD) Modeling
Background:
- Nested multiple response models are crucial in pharmacometrics but sensitive to methodological assumptions.
- Sequential and First Order (FO) estimation techniques can introduce bias in these models.
- Understanding design consequences of different estimation methods (FO vs. First Order Conditional Estimation (FOCE)) and design strategies (sequential vs. simultaneous) is critical.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different design strategies and estimation methods on nested multiple response models.
- To evaluate the influence of nonlinearity on optimal design choices.
- To compare predicted standard errors with empirical estimates from simulation studies.
Main Methods:
- Developed design theory for nested multiple response models.
- Compared sequential versus simultaneous design strategies with FO and FOCE.
- Incorporated parameter-effects curvature (nonlinearity) into the design optimization.
- Utilized a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for investigation.
- Extended methodology to include discrete (binary) response variables.
- Validated findings using simulation/estimation studies in NONMEM.
Main Results:
- Sequential and FO approaches demonstrated potential for biased results, particularly under higher nonlinearity.
- Simultaneous design with FOCE generally provided more robust and accurate parameter estimation.
- The study explored designs for continuous and discrete response variables.
- For binary response models, sequential optimization (product design) may offer near-optimal results due to limited information content.
Conclusions:
- Simultaneous design and FOCE are preferable for nested multiple response models to mitigate bias.
- Nonlinearity significantly influences optimal design choices, necessitating its inclusion in the optimization process.
- Discrete responses in PKPD models may require specific design considerations, potentially favoring sequential optimization strategies.
More Related Videos
08:58Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
Published on: October 17, 2025
13:54A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)
Published on: August 18, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal assumptions,...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Link Model and Systems Pharmacodynamic Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions