Related Experiment Videos
Two instructional designs for dialogic citizenship education: an effect study.
Jaap Schuitema1, Wiel Veugelers, Gert Rijlaarsdam
1Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.a.schuitema@uva.nl
The British Journal of Educational Psychology
|February 20, 2009
Summary
Dialogic citizenship education in history classes improves students' ability to justify opinions on moral issues. Incorporating more group work enhances this effect, making it more effective than whole-class teaching for fostering deeper understanding.
Area of Science:
- Education
- Civic Education
- Pedagogy
Background:
- Limited empirical research exists on effective methods for implementing citizenship education in classrooms.
- Dialogue is recognized as a critical component of citizenship education, yet its practical application remains under-researched.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the integration of citizenship education within history classes.
- To assess the impact of a dialogic approach on students' moral reasoning and opinion justification.
Main Methods:
- Two curriculum units promoting dialogic citizenship education were implemented with 482 eighth-grade students.
- Student essays on moral issues were used to evaluate their ability to justify opinions.
- Effectiveness was compared between dialogic approaches (varying group work) and regular history instruction.
Main Results:
- Students in dialogic citizenship education classes demonstrated superior ability in justifying opinions compared to those in regular history classes.
- A greater emphasis on group work within the dialogic approach correlated with improved opinion justification.
Conclusions:
- Integrating dialogic citizenship education into history curricula enhances students' capacity for forming well-reasoned opinions on moral topics.
- Group work appears to be a more effective pedagogical strategy for facilitating dialogue in citizenship education than whole-class teaching.
Related Concept Videos
Bystander Effect
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Experimental Designs
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.