Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
Published on: March 12, 2021
Comparison study of indirect MR arthrography and direct MR arthrography of the shoulder
Jee Young Jung1, Young Cheol Yoon, Sang-Kyu Yi
1Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul 135-710, Republic of Korea.
Objective:
To compare the diagnostic value of indirect magnetic resonance arthrography (I-MRA) with that of direct MR arthrography (D-MRA) for labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tears using a 3-T MR unit.
Materials And Methods:
Institutional review board approval was given; written informed consent was obtained from all patients. From November 2005 to June 2006, 19 patients (eight men and 11 women; mean age, 51 years) who had undergone both I-MRA and D-MRA underwent arthroscopic surgery. Both methods were performed in fat-saturated axial, coronal oblique, and sagittal oblique T1-weighted sequences, as well as axial and coronal oblique T2-weighted sequences. Two radiologists independently and retrospectively evaluated two sets of MRA for the diagnosis of superior and anterior labral tears, subscapularis tendon (SSC), and supraspinatus-infraspinatus tendon (SSP-ISP) tears, and LHBT tears. With the arthroscopic finding as a gold standard, we analyzed statistical differences of sensitivities and specificities between two sets of MRA and inter-observer agreement was evaluated using the kappa value.
Results:
The sensitivity and specificity of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 1 were 79/80% and 71/80%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/100% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/75% and 64/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 100/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP-ISP tears; and 67/100% and 78/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. Those of I-MRA and D-MRA for reader 2 were 86/80% and 71/100%, respectively, for superior labral tears; 100/83% and 100/100%, respectively, for anterior labral tears; 64/88% and 82/100%, respectively, for SSC tears; 92/86% and 100/100%, respectively, for SSP-ISP tears; and 78/90% and 89/100%, respectively, for LHBT tears. No significant differences were found between the methods. Inter-observer agreements were higher than moderate (kappa > 0.41) with both methods.
Conclusions:
Based on a relatively small number of patients, no significant difference was detected between I-MRI and D-MRI with regard rotator cuff, labral, and LHBT tears.
Insights
Indirect MR arthrography (I-MRA) and direct MR arthrography (D-MRA) show similar diagnostic value for labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and biceps tendon tears. Both methods offer comparable sensitivity and specificity in detecting these shoulder pathologies.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic imaging
- Diagnostic radiology
- Musculoskeletal MRI
Background:
- Shoulder injuries, including labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) tears, are common causes of shoulder pain and dysfunction.
- Accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment planning and patient outcomes.
- Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) is a valuable tool for evaluating intra-articular shoulder pathologies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of indirect MR arthrography (I-MRA) versus direct MR arthrography (D-MRA) for detecting labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and LHBT tears.
- To assess the sensitivity and specificity of both I-MRA and D-MRA techniques.
- To evaluate inter-observer agreement for both imaging modalities.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 19 patients who underwent both I-MRA and D-MRA prior to arthroscopic surgery.
- Standardized MRI sequences (T1-weighted fat-saturated, T2-weighted) were utilized for both techniques.
- Two independent radiologists retrospectively reviewed all MRA scans, comparing findings to arthroscopic surgery results as the gold standard.
Main Results:
- Both I-MRA and D-MRA demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing anterior labral tears and supraspinatus-infraspinatus tendon tears.
- Sensitivity and specificity for superior labral tears, subscapularis tendon tears, and LHBT tears were comparable between I-MRA and D-MRA across both readers.
- Inter-observer agreement was moderate to substantial (kappa > 0.41) for both imaging techniques, indicating good reproducibility.
Conclusions:
- No statistically significant difference was found in the diagnostic performance between I-MRA and D-MRA for evaluating labral tears, rotator cuff tears, and LHBT tears.
- Both indirect and direct MR arthrography are effective imaging modalities for diagnosing common shoulder pathologies.
- The choice between I-MRA and D-MRA may depend on specific clinical scenarios and institutional preferences.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
