Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
Canine complete blood counts: a comparison of four in-office instruments with the ADVIA 120 and manual differential
Elizabeth G Welles1, Amy S Hall, D Mark Carpenter
1Department of Pathobiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5519, USA. welleeg@vetmed.auburn.edu
Insights
The Hemavet 950 and Heska CBC-Diff analyzers demonstrated the best accuracy for canine CBC results among the tested bench-top instruments. Leukocyte differential counts were generally unreliable across most in-office analyzers.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Hematology
- Comparative Diagnostics
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Increasing reliance on bench-top hematology analyzers in veterinary practice necessitates accurate results.
- Varied methodologies in cell counting and differentiation by analyzers, with infrequent manual blood smear examination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare canine complete blood count (CBC) results from four bench-top analyzers against a reference analyzer (ADVIA 120) and manual counts.
- Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and comparability of in-office hematology instruments.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 100 EDTA-anticoagulated canine blood samples on Hemavet 950, Heska CBC-Diff, IDEXX LaserCyte, and IDEXX VetAutoread.
- Comparison with ADVIA 120 and manual 100-cell leukocyte differentials.
- Statistical analysis including linear regression, difference plots, paired t-tests, and diagnostic equivalence.
Main Results:
- High correlations for HCT, WBC, and platelet counts between in-office analyzers and ADVIA 120, but variable accuracy.
- Hemavet 950 and Heska CBC-Diff showed the best comparability with ADVIA and manual differentials.
- Leukocyte differentials from all in-office analyzers were largely unreliable, except for neutrophil counts.
Conclusions:
- Hemavet 950 and Heska CBC-Diff offered the best performance among the evaluated bench-top analyzers.
- Leukocyte differential counts from in-office analyzers were unreliable, offering no advantage over 3-part differentials.
- Reticulocyte assessment on LaserCyte and VetAutoread was unreliable compared to the ADVIA 120.
Background:
With more use of bench-top in-office hematology analyzers, the accuracy of reported values is increasingly important. Instruments use varied methods for cell counting and differentiation, and blood smears may not always be examined.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to compare canine CBC results using 4 bench-top instruments (Hemavet 950, Heska CBC-Diff, IDEXX LaserCyte, and IDEXX VetAutoread) with ADVIA 120 and manual leukocyte counts.
Methods:
EDTA-anticoagulated canine blood samples (n=100) were analyzed on each instrument. Manual differentials were based on 100-cell counts. Linear regression, difference plots, paired t-tests, and estimation of diagnostic equivalence were used to analyze results.
Results:
Correlations of HCT, WBC, and platelet counts were very good to excellent between all in-office instruments and the ADVIA 120, but results varied in accuracy (comparability). Hemavet 950 and Heska CBC-Diff results compared best with ADVIA results and manual leukocyte differentials. HCT and platelet counts on the IDEXX VetAutoread compared well with those from the ADVIA. Except for neutrophil counts, leukocyte differentials from all instruments compared poorly with ADVIA and manual counts. Reticulocyte counts on the LaserCyte and VetAutoread compared poorly with those from the ADVIA.
Conclusions:
The Hemavet 950 and Heska CBC-Diff performed best of the 4 analyzers we compared. HCT, WBC, and platelet counts on the LaserCyte had minimally sufficient comparability for diagnostic use. Except for neutrophils (granulocytes), leukocyte differential counts were unreliable on all in-office analyzers. Instruments with a 5-part leukocyte differential provided no added benefit over a 3-part differential. Assessment of erythrocyte regeneration on the LaserCyte and VetAutoread was unreliable compared with the ADVIA 120.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Flow Cytometry
In...

