Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease
Patrick W Serruys1, Marie-Claude Morice, A Pieter Kappetein
1Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. p.w.j.c.serruys@erasmusmc.nl
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex coronary artery disease. CABG showed lower rates of major adverse events, though PCI had fewer strokes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Drug-eluting stents in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are increasingly used for complex coronary artery disease.
- Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has historically been the preferred treatment.
- This trial compared PCI and CABG for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of PCI versus CABG in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.
- To determine if PCI is noninferior to CABG in terms of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events.
Main Methods:
- 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease were randomized (1:1) to undergo either CABG or PCI.
- The primary endpoint was a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization within 12 months.
- A noninferiority design was used to compare the two treatment groups.
Main Results:
- Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events were significantly higher in the PCI group (17.8%) compared to the CABG group (12.4%) at 12 months (P=0.002).
- The increased event rate in the PCI group was largely due to a higher need for repeat revascularization (13.5% vs. 5.9%, P<0.001).
- Stroke rates were higher with CABG (2.2%) than with PCI (0.6%) (P=0.003), while death and myocardial infarction rates were similar.
Conclusions:
- Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the standard of care for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.
- CABG demonstrated lower rates of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events compared to PCI at 1 year.
- The noninferiority criterion for PCI was not met in this study.
Background:
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involving drug-eluting stents is increasingly used to treat complex coronary artery disease, although coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the treatment of choice historically. Our trial compared PCI and CABG for treating patients with previously untreated three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease (or both).
Methods:
We randomly assigned 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease to undergo CABG or PCI (in a 1:1 ratio). For all these patients, the local cardiac surgeon and interventional cardiologist determined that equivalent anatomical revascularization could be achieved with either treatment. A noninferiority comparison of the two groups was performed for the primary end point--a major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (i.e., death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) during the 12-month period after randomization. Patients for whom only one of the two treatment options would be beneficial, because of anatomical features or clinical conditions, were entered into a parallel, nested CABG or PCI registry.
Results:
Most of the preoperative characteristics were similar in the two groups. Rates of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 12 months were significantly higher in the PCI group (17.8%, vs. 12.4% for CABG; P=0.002), in large part because of an increased rate of repeat revascularization (13.5% vs. 5.9%, P<0.001); as a result, the criterion for noninferiority was not met. At 12 months, the rates of death and myocardial infarction were similar between the two groups; stroke was significantly more likely to occur with CABG (2.2%, vs. 0.6% with PCI; P=0.003).
Conclusions:
CABG remains the standard of care for patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, since the use of CABG, as compared with PCI, resulted in lower rates of the combined end point of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114972.)
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery (ALCAPA)
Published on: April 24, 2017
09:12Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview