Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Meta-analysis of mortality in dialysis patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Rahul Sakhuja1, Mary Keebler, Tai-Shuan Lai
1Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Insights
Patients on dialysis face higher sudden cardiac death risks. Even with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), dialysis patients show significantly increased mortality, suggesting limited benefit for this population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Patients undergoing dialysis have a high risk of sudden cardiac death.
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) improve survival in many groups, but dialysis patients are often excluded from trials.
- Limited data exists on ICD effectiveness in dialysis patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients receiving dialysis.
- To synthesize current evidence on ICDs and mortality risk in dialysis patients.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of studies published between 1999 and 2008 was conducted.
- Searches included Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and scientific meeting proceedings.
- Data from seven studies involving 2,516 patients (89 on dialysis) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Dialysis patients with ICDs had a 2.7-fold higher mortality rate compared to non-dialysis patients.
- No significant difference in mortality was observed between dialysis patients and those with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.
- No publication bias was detected.
Conclusions:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) do not mitigate the increased mortality risk in dialysis patients.
- Dialysis patients with ICDs face a substantially higher risk of death than those not on dialysis.
- Beta-blocker cardioprotection may be diminished in dialysis patients with ICDs.
Abstract:
Patients receiving dialysis are at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Although clinical trials have shown that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are effective in improving survival in a variety of populations, dialysis patients have been routinely excluded from these analyses. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of ICD therapy in patients receiving dialysis. Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for pertinent studies published from 1999 to 2008. In addition, hand searches of the relevant annual scientific sessions and major scientific meetings in North America and Europe from 2000 to 2008 were performed. All clinical reports describing outcomes of ICD therapy in relation to renal function were eligible. Four investigators independently extracted the data in a standardized manner. Seven studies were identified, with a total of 2,516 patients and 89 patients receiving dialysis. Despite having ICDs, patients receiving dialysis had a 2.7-fold higher mortality compared with those not receiving dialysis. The results were similar in fixed- and random-effects models. Comparing patients receiving dialysis and those with chronic kidney disease but not receiving dialysis, there was no significant difference in mortality (risk ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 3.14). No evidence of publication bias was found. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that even in those with ICDs, there is still a 2.7-fold increased mortality risk in patients who receive dialysis compared with those who do not. Beta blockers may be less cardioprotective in patients with ICDs who are on dialysis.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
