Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
Published on: July 4, 2016
Comparison of an internally coordinated 2-pentenyllithium with its 4-sila analog. Structure and dynamic behavior:
Gideon Fraenkel1, José Cabral, Xiao Chen
1Department of Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. fraenkel@mps.ohio-state.edu
Abstract:
Four allylic lithium compounds have been prepared with a tethered ligand, (CH(3)OCH(2)CH(2))(2)NCH(2)C(CH(3))(2)-L, attached to a terminal allyl carbon. They are equimolar equilibrium mixtures of 3-endo-L-allyllithium with 3-exo-L-allyllithium, 9en and 9ex, respectively, and (separately) 1-exo-TMS-3-endo-L-allyllithium with 1-exo-TMS-3-exo-L-allyllithium, 13en and 13ex, respectively. Carbon-13 NMR analysis shows that all four compounds are monomeric and internally coordinated, the allyl moiety in each one is partially localized, and (7)Li is spin coupled to both (31)C(1) and (13)C(2) of allyl. NMR line shape changes show that 9en, 9ex, 13en, and 13ex all undergo fast transfer of the lithium-coordinated ligand between faces of the allyl planes at low temperatures. Within each equilibrium system the compound with the exo-tethered ligand inverts faster than its endo analog. All four compounds invert faster in THF-d(10) compared to in diethyl ether-d(10) as solvent. Corresponding Eyring activation parameters are reported. Also, inversion in THF-d(8) for all four compounds is characterized by large negative DeltaS(double dagger) values, whereas in diethyl ether-d(10) DeltaS(double dagger) values for inversion are near neutral. NMR line shape changes due to the dynamics of bimolecular C,Li exchange and rotation around the C(2)-C(3) bonds are just detected via selective line broadening effects above 290 K. These processes are much slower than inversion.
More Related Videos
14:55Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Published on: September 17, 2017
10:52Line Shape Analysis of Dynamic NMR Spectra for Characterizing Coordination Sphere Rearrangements at a Chiral Rhenium Polyhydride Complex
Published on: July 27, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.