Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Pinching-off of Coated Vesicles

Pinching-off of Coated Vesicles

Vesicle budding is orchestrated by distinct cytosolic proteins such as adaptor proteins, coat proteins, and GTPases. To initiate vesicle budding, membrane-bending proteins containing crescent-shaped BAR domains bind to the lipid heads in the bilayer and distort the membrane to form a protein-coated vesicle bud. Adaptors proteins such as AP2 for clathrin-coated vesicles can nucleate on the deformed membrane. Finally, coat proteins such as clathrin or COPI and COPII assemble into a coat forming...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

In situ three-dimensional printing for reparative and regenerative therapy.

Biomedical microdevices·2019

Same author

A Perspective on 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Regeneration.

Bio-design and manufacturing·2019

Same author

Sutureless repair of corneal injuries using naturally derived bioadhesive hydrogels.

Science advances·2019

Same author

Hierarchically Patterned Polydopamine-Containing Membranes for Periodontal Tissue Engineering.

ACS nano·2019

Same author

A Microfabricated Sandwiching Assay for Nanoliter and High-Throughput Biomarker Screening.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2019

Same author

A simple layer-stacking technique to generate biomolecular and mechanical gradients in photocrosslinkable hydrogels.

Biofabrication·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Microfluidic Device with Groove Patterns for Studying Cellular Behavior

A Microfluidic Device with Groove Patterns for Studying Cellular Behavior

Published on: August 30, 2007

Cell docking in double grooves in a microfluidic channel.

Masoud Khabiry¹, Bong Geun Chung, Matthew J Hancock

¹Center for Biomedical Engineering, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 021158, USA.

Small (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany)

|February 27, 2009

Summary

New double microgrooves immobilize cells in microfluidic channels, offering shear protection for cell-based biosensing and drug discovery applications. This controlled cell patterning enhances microfluidic device functionality.

More Related Videos

Bilayer Microfluidic Device for Combinatorial Plug Production

Bilayer Microfluidic Device for Combinatorial Plug Production

Published on: December 1, 2023

Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device

Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device

Published on: October 1, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Microfluidic Device with Groove Patterns for Studying Cellular Behavior

A Microfluidic Device with Groove Patterns for Studying Cellular Behavior

Published on: August 30, 2007

Bilayer Microfluidic Device for Combinatorial Plug Production

Bilayer Microfluidic Device for Combinatorial Plug Production

Published on: December 1, 2023

Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device

Cell Capture Using a Microfluidic Device

Published on: October 1, 2007

Area of Science:

Biomedical Engineering
Microfluidics
Cell Biology

Background:

Microstructures in microchannels can immobilize cells, enabling applications in biosensing and drug screening.
Shear-protected regions are crucial for maintaining cell viability and function within microfluidic systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and characterize double microgrooves for controlled, shear-protected cell immobilization.
To investigate the relationship between microgroove geometry, shear stress, and cell docking patterns.

Main Methods:

A two-step fabrication method was employed to create double microgrooves with varying depth ratios.
Six distinct microgroove geometries were fabricated and tested.
Computational fluid dynamics simulations were used to analyze flow patterns and shear stress distribution.
Experimental cell docking and retention were analyzed under varying flow conditions.

Main Results:

Two distinct cell docking modes were observed: upstream in deep, narrow grooves and downstream in shallow, wide grooves.
Cell retention demonstrated a linear dependence on inlet flow speed.
The degree of shear protection, indicated by the slope of cell retention, was inversely proportional to groove geometry sheltering.

Conclusions:

Double microgrooves effectively create shear-protected regions for controlled cell immobilization in microfluidic channels.
The findings suggest that these microstructures are promising for advancing cell-based biosensing and drug discovery platforms.
Microfluidic channel design with double microgrooves offers a tunable approach for cell manipulation.