Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Multifocal visual evoked potential responses to pattern-reversal, pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and sparse pulse

Brad Fortune1, Shaban Demirel, Bang V Bui

  • 1Discoveries in Sight Research Laboratories, Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Health System, Portland, Oregon 97232, USA. bfortune@deverseye.org

Visual Neuroscience
|March 3, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of Confocal Multispectral Imaging Using a Common Commercial Device and Application in a Healthy Aging Mouse Model.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Frequency, Severity and Ergonomic Awareness of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Australian Optometrists: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026
Same author

"Getting to diagnosis was an absolute nightmare": survey insights about the lived experience of spinal CSF leak in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of CRISPR/CasRx-Mediated VEGF mRNA Knockdown in Mouse Retina.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

Response of the Rat Eye to Acute and Chronic Optic Nerve Pressure Modifications.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Rhesus macaques with an <i>OPA1</i> mutation demonstrate features of autosomal dominant optic atrophy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Support for the efficient coding account of visual discomfort.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Visual Field Asymmetries in Responses to ON and OFF Pathway Biasing Stimuli.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Pattern reversal chromatic VEPs like onsets, are unaffected by attentional demand.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

The interaction between luminance polarity grouping and symmetry axes on the ERP responses to symmetry.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Electroretinographic responses to periodic stimuli in primates and the relevance for visual perception and for clinical studies.

Visual neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Synaptotagmin-9 in mouse retina.

Visual neuroscience·2024
See all related articles

Comparing multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) stimuli, this study found that while onset responses are larger than standard reversal responses, only spatial sparsity improves signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Temporal sparsity alone does not enhance mfVEP SNR.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is crucial for assessing retinal function.
  • Optimizing mfVEP stimuli is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy and signal detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare standard mfVEP pattern-reversal responses with those elicited by pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and pulsed pattern stimuli.
  • To investigate the impact of temporal and spatial sparseness on mfVEP responses and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

Main Methods:

  • mfVEP recordings were obtained from five normal subjects using VERIS and a 4-electrode array.
  • Stimuli included standard reversal, pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and pulsed patterns with varying temporal and spatial parameters.
  • Response amplitudes, waveforms, and SNR were analyzed across different stimulus conditions.

More Related Videos

Multifocal Electroretinograms
16:49

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Multifocal Electroretinograms
16:49

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

Main Results:

  • Standard mfVEP reversal responses were similar to onset responses but smaller in amplitude (~3.5x).
  • Pattern-onset responses were larger than offset responses, particularly in the lower visual field.
  • While temporal sparsity increased response amplitude, only spatial isolation significantly improved SNR for both reversal and pulsed stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • Pattern-onset stimuli yield larger mfVEP responses than standard reversal, but do not inherently improve SNR.
  • Spatial sparsity is critical for enhancing mfVEP SNR, suggesting the dominance of lateral inhibitory mechanisms over temporal gain control.
  • mfVEP response polarity is dependent on contrast step polarity, regardless of adaptation state.