Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026
07:43
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system
B Schlatterer1, I Suedhoff, X Bonnet
1Monaco Sportsmedicine and Surgery Institute, 11, avenue d'Ostende, 98000 Monaco, Monaco. bernard.schlatterer@wanadoo.fr
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research : OTSR
|March 3, 2009
Summary
Precise lower extremity landmarks are crucial for total knee replacement accuracy. This study found femoral landmarks reliable, but tibial landmarks need improvement for better implant positioning.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate lower extremity alignment is essential for successful total knee replacement (TKR).
- Reliable skeletal landmarks are required for precise analysis of implant positioning.
- Current landmark uncertainties may impact TKR outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vivo precision of skeletal landmarks used in lower extremity analysis.
- To assess the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) computer reconstructions derived from EOS biplanar low-dose X-ray system acquisitions.
- To determine the reliability of specific femoral and tibial landmarks for TKR planning.
Main Methods:
- Utilized EOS biplanar low-dose X-ray system for nine lower extremity 3D reconstructions.
- Developed a database of 99 in vivo 3D reconstructions from multiple operators and series.
- Defined four femoral and four tibial landmarks, calculating translation and rotation deviations with 95% confidence intervals.
Main Results:
- Femoral landmarks at the posterior condyle center and tibial plateau barycenter demonstrated high reliability (translation uncertainty < 1.5 mm).
- Femoral rotation uncertainty was low (Rx, Ry, Rz < 4 degrees), while tibial rotation (Ry) showed higher uncertainty (11.2 degrees).
- Tibial translation parameters had a mean error of approximately 1 mm.
Conclusions:
- Posterior condyles are reliable femoral landmarks for TKR positioning analysis.
- Posterior tibial plateau contours exhibit less precision, necessitating improved reconstruction algorithms.
- EOS biplanar X-ray systems offer a promising tool for 3D knee analysis in TKR evaluation and follow-up.
