Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Published on: February 23, 2024

Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.

E M Ongkosuwito¹, M M J Dieleman, A M Kuijpers-Jagtman

¹Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. e.ongkosuwito@erasmusmc.nl

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal : Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association

|March 4, 2009

Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Awareness and perception of white spot lesions amongst adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: a cross-sectional study of caries preventive adherence.

European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry·2026

Same author

One decade of point-prevalence surveys for carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacterales: whole genome sequencing based prevalence and genetic characterization in a large Dutch teaching hospital from 2013 to 2022.

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control·2024

Same author

Impact of Unilateral Alveolar Bone Grafting on Nasal Volume and Nasolabial Surface: A 3D Analysis.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2023

Same author

[Diagnosis of ankylotic deciduous molars using intraoral scans in oligodontic patients].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2023

Same author

Stem cells and extracellular vesicles to improve preclinical orofacial soft tissue healing.

Stem cell research & therapy·2023

Same author

Oral health-related quality of life in patients with oligodontia: A FACE-Q assessment.

Journal of dentistry·2023

Orthopantomograms (OPTs) offer reliable mandibular length measurements, comparable to lateral cephalograms. This study found no significant magnification differences, making OPTs a viable alternative for key linear measurements.

Area of Science:

Dental radiology
Maxillofacial imaging
Cephalometric analysis

Background:

Accurate mandibular linear measurements are crucial for orthodontic and maxillofacial diagnoses.
Orthopantomograms (OPTs) and lateral cephalograms are common radiographic techniques used for these measurements.
Assessing the comparative reliability of these methods is essential for clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the reliability of mandibular length measurements obtained from orthopantomograms (OPTs) versus lateral cephalograms.
To evaluate intraobserver and interobserver variability in landmark identification on both radiographic types.
To determine magnification differences between the left and right sides of the mandible on OPTs.

Main Methods:

An observational study involving 20 human dry skulls.

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Published on: February 23, 2024

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Radiographs (OPTs and lateral cephalograms) were analyzed by four orthodontists and four maxillofacial surgeons.

Cephalometric measurements were performed using computer software, assessing landmark location reliability.

Statistical analysis included kappa statistics for intra- and interobserver reliability and F-tests for method and observer type differences.

Main Results:

No significant magnification differences were found between the left and right sides of the mandible on OPTs.
OPTs demonstrated comparable reliability to lateral cephalograms for measuring condylion-gonion, gonion-menton, and condylion-menton distances.
No significant differences in skull positioning or repositioning were noted between x-ray assistants for either method.
Significant differences in landmark measurements were observed between orthodontists and maxillofacial surgeons.

Conclusions:

Orthopantomograms are as reliable as lateral cephalograms for linear mandibular measurements.
The findings support the use of OPTs as a reliable alternative for assessing key mandibular dimensions.
Further research may explore the clinical implications of observer differences in landmark identification.