Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Global Regulatory Systems01:28

Global Regulatory Systems

Global regulatory systems in bacteria enable rapid and coordinated responses to environmental changes by integrating sensory inputs with gene expression, ensuring efficient adaptation to fluctuating conditions. Key global regulatory mechanisms include regulons, two-component systems, sigma factors, and secondary messengers.Regulons and Global RegulatorsA regulon is a collection of genes and operons controlled by a common global regulator. These regulators enable bacteria to prioritize resource...
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators02:04

Covalently Linked Protein Regulators

Proteins can undergo many types of post-translational modifications, often in response to changes in their environment. These modifications play an important role in the function and stability of these proteins. Covalently linked molecules include functional groups, such as methyl, acetyl, and phosphate groups, and also small proteins, such as ubiquitin. There are around 200 different types of covalent regulators that have been identified.
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein.
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators02:04

Covalently Linked Protein Regulators

Proteins can undergo many types of post-translational modifications, often in response to changes in their environment. These modifications play an important role in the function and stability of these proteins. Covalently linked molecules include functional groups, such as methyl, acetyl, and phosphate groups, and also small proteins, such as ubiquitin. There are around 200 different types of covalent regulators that have been identified.
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein.
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps02:24

Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps

Gene expression can be regulated at almost every step from gene to protein. Transcription is the step that is most commonly regulated. This involves the binding of proteins to short regulatory sequences on the DNA. This association can either promote or inhibit the transcription of a gene associated with the respective sequence.
Transcription results in the generation of precursor (pre-mRNA) that consists of both exons and introns, which needs further processing before being translated to a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-organized collapse of societies.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Epidemics with asymptomatic transmission: Subcritical phase from recursive contact tracing.

Physical review. E·2021
Same author

Self-organized criticality in neural networks from activity-based rewiring.

Physical review. E·2021
Same author

Discrimination emerging through spontaneous symmetry breaking in a spatial prisoner's dilemma model with multiple labels.

Physical review. E·2020
Same author

Repulsion in controversial debate drives public opinion into fifty-fifty stalemate.

Physical review. E·2019
Same author

A Multi-Organ Nucleus Segmentation Challenge.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

Reliability of regulatory networks and its evolution.

Stefan Braunewell1, Stefan Bornholdt

  • 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bremen, D-28359 Bremen, Germany.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|March 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study explores biological regulatory network reliability using a generalized Boolean network model. Evolved networks maintain function while improving dynamic reliability, showing structure impacts performance.

More Related Videos

A Multilayer Microfluidic Platform for the Conduction of Prolonged Cell-Free Gene Expression
11:23

A Multilayer Microfluidic Platform for the Conduction of Prolonged Cell-Free Gene Expression

Published on: October 6, 2019

Rapid Development of Cell State Identification Circuits with Poly-Transfection
09:21

Rapid Development of Cell State Identification Circuits with Poly-Transfection

Published on: February 24, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

A Multilayer Microfluidic Platform for the Conduction of Prolonged Cell-Free Gene Expression
11:23

A Multilayer Microfluidic Platform for the Conduction of Prolonged Cell-Free Gene Expression

Published on: October 6, 2019

Rapid Development of Cell State Identification Circuits with Poly-Transfection
09:21

Rapid Development of Cell State Identification Circuits with Poly-Transfection

Published on: February 24, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Systems Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Network Science

Background:

  • Biological regulatory networks are crucial for cellular functions.
  • Understanding the reliability of their dynamics is essential for predicting system behavior.
  • Noise and continuous timing introduce challenges to network stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reliability of dynamics in biological regulatory networks.
  • To analyze how network structure influences reliability using a generalized Boolean network model.
  • To explore evolutionary processes that select for reliable network dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a generalized Boolean network model incorporating continuous timing and noise.
  • Employed artificial genetic networks, specifically the repressilator, as a model system.
  • Investigated reliability through a simulated evolution process where networks were selected for stable dynamics.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that rhythmic attractors in biological networks can be characterized by reliability.
  • Showed that network structure significantly impacts the reliability of dynamic processes.
  • Found that evolutionary selection can readily enhance network reliability without compromising original function.

Conclusions:

  • Network structure is a key determinant of dynamic reliability in biological systems.
  • Evolutionary mechanisms can efficiently optimize biological networks for reliable functioning.
  • The generalized Boolean network model provides a robust framework for studying network reliability.