Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits
Published on: October 12, 2015
Leaf mesophyll diffusion conductance in 35 Australian sclerophylls covering a broad range of foliage structural and
Ulo Niinemets1, Ian J Wright, John R Evans
1Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia. ylo.niinemets@emu.ee
Abstract:
Foliage structure, chemistry, photosynthetic potentials (V(cmax) and J(max)), and mesophyll diffusion conductance (g(m)) were quantified for 35 broad-leaved species from four sites with contrasting rainfall and soil fertility in eastern Australia. The aim of the study was to estimate the extent to which g(m) and related leaf properties limited photosynthesis (A), focusing on highly sclerophyllous species typical of the 'slow-return' end of the leaf economics spectrum. Leaf dry mass per unit area (M(A)) varied approximately 5-fold, leaf life span (L(L)) and N (N(M)) and P (P(M)) contents per dry mass approximately 8-fold, and various characteristics of foliage photosynthetic machinery 6- to 12-fold across the data set. As is characteristic of the 'leaf economics spectrum', more robust leaves with greater M(A) and longevity were associated with lower nutrient contents and lower foliage photosynthetic potentials. g(m) was positively correlated with V(cmax) and J(max), and these correlations were stronger on a mass basis. Only g(m)/mass was negatively associated with M(A). CO(2) drawdown from substomatal cavities to chloroplasts (C(i)-C(C)) characterizing mesophyll CO(2) diffusion limitations was larger in leaves with greater M(A), lower g(m)/mass, and lower photosynthetic potentials. Relative limitation of A due to finite mesophyll diffusion conductance, i.e. 1-A(infinite g(m))/A(actual g(m)), was always >0.2 and up to 0.5 in leaves with most robust leaf structure, demonstrating the profound effect of finite g(m) on realized photosynthesis rates. Data from different sites were overlapping in bivariate relationships, and the variability of average values between the sites was less than among the species within the sites. Nevertheless, photosynthesis was more strongly limited by g(m) in low rain/high nutrient and high rain/low nutrient sites that supported vegetation with more sclerophyllous foliage. These data collectively highlight a strong relationship between leaf structure and g(m), and demonstrate that realized photosynthesis rates are strongly limited by g(m) in this highly sclerophyllous flora.
More Related Videos
12:11Measurement of Leaf Hydraulic Conductance and Stomatal Conductance and Their Responses to Irradiance and Dehydration Using the Evaporative Flux Method (EFM)
Published on: December 31, 2012
06:04Assessing Structural Traits in Triticum aestivum and Zea mays for C3 and C4 Photosynthetic Differentiation Using Free-hand and Semi-thin Sections
Published on: July 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Light Acquisition
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Xylem and Transpiration-driven Transport of Resources
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
External and Internal Respiration
Short-distance Transport of Resources