Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants
Published on: May 4, 2018
[Genomic comparisons of multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from surgical intensive care unit]
Yu-Ming Wang1, Yu-Cun Liu, Yuan-Lian Wan
1Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Objective:
To investigate the genetic differences and their relativity with multi-drug resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated.
Methods:
Forty-nine Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility and four-enzyme (I-CeuI, SpeI, SwaI, PacI) pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).
Results:
85.7% of the P.aeruginosa isolates were MDR strains. Strains with PFGE pattern A were all susceptible to amikacin and cefepime, but were resistant to levofloxacin and meropenem. Strains with PFGE Patterns H and P had resistance to 6 - 8 different kinds of antibiotics. Strains with PFGE Patterns I and J were susceptible to all antibiotics tested in this study. Strains with other PFGE Patterns had intermediate resistance. PFGE pattern A was the dominant pattern, which accounted for 61.2% of all P.aeruginosa strains, 100% (2/2) in 2001, 65% (13/20) in 2002, 44.4% (8/18) in 2003 and 77.8% (7/9) in 2004.
Conclusion:
Four-enzyme combined PFGE analysis is highly discriminatory for the subtyping of MDR P.aeruginosa isolates.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
